- From: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 19:19:23 -0800
- To: "'ietf-http-wg@w3.org'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, "'Jeffrey Mogul'" <mogul@pa.dec.com>
I'd also note that this is 1/2 way (or so) to a way to avoid much or all of the problem of proxies fiddling with the headers -- create the digest over a cononical form of the values of the header, instead of what's actually sent or received. > 1. Compose the subset of headers to be digested > 2. Combine into a single string with CR/LF between headers 3. Canonicalize (reduce LWS to a single space -- anything else?) 4. Digest it Paul > ---------- > From: Jeffrey Mogul[SMTP:mogul@pa.dec.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 1997 3:55 PM > To: 'ietf-http-wg@w3.org'; http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com > Subject: Re: FW: Digest mess > > Ben Laurie writes: > > David W. Morris wrote: > > Also, they encoding rule should probably be something like: > > > > 1. Compose the subset of headers to be digested > > 2. Combine into a single string with CR/LF between headers > > 3. Encode the whole string. > > Isn't that exactly what Jeffrey was suggesting? > > Exactly. Except that I simply asserted that this was easy to > specify; David actually wrote the spec :-) > > -Jeff >
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 1998 22:19:44 UTC