Foteos Macrides wrote: > >State Management: > >[...] > >Following the slide presentation, there was discussion on the privacy > >considerations in the draft. Ted Hardie: In Comment-URL, the URL could > >potentially be a non-HTTP URL, and this issue needs to be addressed. > > I am puzzled by this statement. In early drafts, there was > no restriction on the scheme for CommentURLs. For security reasons, > the Lynx field test implementation limited them to server-based > schemes (e.g., http(s), gopher, ftp, wais). Subsequent drafts > explicitly limited CommentURLs to http (and https by implication :) > and the implementation in the recent Lynx v2.7.2 release so restricts > them. Isn't this a closed issue? What Larry sent out were the minutes of the WG session. Ted raised an issue that we checked. In fact you are right: the protocol is explicitly "http" and the issue is closed. Dave KristolReceived on Wednesday, 7 January 1998 10:26:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:04 UTC