ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 1998 by date

Tuesday, 31 March 1998

• Re: new issue: confusing statement about HTTP/1.1 version numbers Scott Lawrence
• new issue: confusing statement about HTTP/1.1 version numbers rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com
• Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Life is hard... and then you die.
• Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' David W. Morris
• Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' David W. Morris

Monday, 30 March 1998

• new editorial issue: redundancy in 3.7.2 (Multipart Types) Jeffrey Mogul
• new issue: confusing statement about HTTP/1.1 version numbers Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Koen Holtman
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03 Koen Holtman
• Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com
• RE: questions regarding draft-ietf-http-authentication-01 Jim Gettys

Sunday, 29 March 1998

• Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Life is hard... and then you die.
• RE: comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Larry Masinter
• Re: questions regarding draft-ietf-http-authentication-01 Life is hard... and then you die.
• Re: questions regarding draft-ietf-http-authentication-01 Scott Lawrence
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Scott Lawrence
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Scott Lawrence
• Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Life is hard... and then you die.
• RE: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Larry Masinter
• Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Roy T. Fielding
• RE: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Larry Masinter
• Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Life is hard... and then you die.

Saturday, 28 March 1998

• RE: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Larry Masinter
• Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Life is hard... and then you die.

Friday, 27 March 1998

• RE: questions regarding draft-ietf-http-authentication-01 Paul Leach

Saturday, 28 March 1998

• RE: Comments on draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03 Paul Leach
• HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Larry Masinter
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03 Jeffrey Mogul

Friday, 27 March 1998

• Re: questions regarding draft-ietf-http-authentication-01 Life is hard... and then you die.
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03 Dave Kristol
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03 Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03 Dave Kristol
• Comments on draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03 Koen Holtman
• http-authentication-01 comments rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com
• Note on interoperability reports... Jim Gettys
• RE: comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Paul Leach
• RE: comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Paul Leach
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Dave Kristol
• RE: comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Jim Gettys
• RE: comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Paul Leach
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Dave Kristol
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Life is hard... and then you die.
• Re: questions regarding draft-ietf-http-authentication-01 Life is hard... and then you die.
• REMOVE ME FROM YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TGCESKY
• RE: comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Paul Leach
• RE: comments on draft-ietf-http-trust-state-mgt-02.txt Jaye, Dan
• Re: what is the scope of accept-range Marc Slemko
• Re: http-v11-spec-rev-03; proxy 100 (Continue) issue Jeffrey Mogul

Thursday, 26 March 1998

• what is the scope of accept-range Daniel Hellerstein
• Re: comments on draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03 Jim Gettys
• comments on draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03 Dave Kristol
• http-v11-spec-rev-03; proxy 100 (Continue) issue rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com
• questions regarding draft-ietf-http-authentication-01 Life is hard... and then you die.

Wednesday, 25 March 1998

• comments on draft-ietf-http-trust-state-mgt-02.txt Dave Kristol
• Issues with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03.txt Life is hard... and then you die.
• RE: HTTP/0.9 Josh Cohen

Tuesday, 24 March 1998

• Re: Comments on revision 03 of " Hypertext Transfer Protocol --HTTP/1.1 " Larry Masinter
• Re: HTTP/0.9 Koen Holtman
• Re: Comments on revision 03 of " Hypertext Transfer Protocol --HTTP/1.1 " Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: HTTP/0.9 Jeffrey Mogul
• Comments on revision 03 of " Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com
• HTTP/0.9 rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com

Monday, 23 March 1998

• Comments on revision 03 of " Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1 " Daniel Hellerstein

Tuesday, 24 March 1998

• Form for reporting on HTTP/1.1 implementations Larry Masinter

Monday, 23 March 1998

• comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Dave Kristol
• another possible ietf-http-ext work item: proxy cookies Dave Kristol

Friday, 20 March 1998

• HTTP/1.1 redirect handling Gisle Aas

Saturday, 21 March 1998

• Re: The last LAST CALL: HTTP/1.1, Authentication, State Larry Masinter
• Looking for TIS/Gauntlet contact Josh Cohen

Friday, 20 March 1998

• Re: http 1.1. Cache Response Codes... David W. Morris
• Re: http 1.1. Cache Response Codes... Scott Lawrence
• Mobile IP and HTTP proxy Jianxin Zhao

Thursday, 19 March 1998

• http 1.1. Cache Response Codes... Michael Wexler

Friday, 20 March 1998

• External bnf references in http1.1/v03 Jacob Schroeder

Thursday, 19 March 1998

• Re: The last LAST CALL: HTTP/1.1, Authentication, State Life is hard... and then you die.

Wednesday, 18 March 1998

• Document Action: The Safe Response Header Field to Experimental The IESG

Tuesday, 17 March 1998

• Repost: Upgrading to TLS within HTTP Rohit Khare

Monday, 16 March 1998

• Re: Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP Rohit Khare
• Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP Rohit Khare
• RE: OPTIONS and TRACE vis a vis CGI applications Woodhouse, Gregory J.
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-ext-mandatory-00.txt Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org
• Re: The last LAST CALL: HTTP/1.1, Authentication, State Management Koen Holtman

Saturday, 14 March 1998

• The last LAST CALL: HTTP/1.1, Authentication, State Management Larry Masinter

Friday, 13 March 1998

• Re: URI Reference jg275 Jim Gettys
• Re: OPTIONS and TRACE vis a vis CGI applications rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03.txt Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org

Thursday, 12 March 1998

• URI Reference jg275 David W. Morris
• Rev-03 of the HTTP/1.1 specification has been submitted... Jim Gettys
• Re: OPTIONS and TRACE vis a vis CGI applications Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Editorial issue 304-SHOULD Jeffrey Mogul
• Production of HTTP/1.1 Rev-03 has started. Jim Gettys
• Re: 505 response a MUST? Jim Gettys
• Re: OPTIONS and TRACE vis a vis CGI applications Scott Lawrence
• Re: new editorial (?) issue: IDENTITY-TE Jim Gettys
• Editorial issue 304-SHOULD Jim Gettys
• Re: comments on HTTP/1.1 Rev02 20Feb98 Dave Kristol
• OPTIONS and TRACE vis a vis CGI applications David W. Morris
• Re: comments on HTTP/1.1 Rev02 20Feb98 Jim Gettys

Wednesday, 11 March 1998

• issue & resolution: PUT-ENTITY-HEADERS Paul Leach
• issue & resolution: LOCATION-PUT Paul Leach
• issue & resolution: 204-UNCLEAR Paul Leach

Tuesday, 10 March 1998

• Re: issue & resolution: IF_PRECEDENCE Roy T. Fielding
• http acceleration and Date headers (fwd) Andrew Daviel
• Re: Editorial Issue: HTTP Trademarked by MIT or W3C Larry Masinter
• Re: issue & resolution: IF_PRECEDENCE John Franks
• issue & resolution: IF_PRECEDENCE Jeffrey Mogul
• Editorial Issue: HTTP Trademarked by MIT or W3C David W. Morris
• issue & resolution: ETAG_CLARITY Jeffrey Mogul

Monday, 9 March 1998

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-trust-state-mgt-02.txt Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org
• Re: http acceleration and Date headers Scott Lawrence

Sunday, 8 March 1998

• http acceleration and Date headers Andrew Daviel

Monday, 9 March 1998

• Re: http acceleration and Date headers Michael Pelletier

Friday, 6 March 1998

• Re: Rigorously defining the interaction of conditional headers Roy T. Fielding

Thursday, 5 March 1998

• Re: Rigorously defining the interaction of conditional headers Dave Kristol
• Re: Rigorously defining the interaction of conditional headers Graham Klyne
• Re: Rigorously defining the interaction of conditional headers John Franks
• Re: Rigorously defining the interaction of conditional headers Roy T. Fielding
• Re: new editorial(?) issue HEAD_WITH_IMS Roy T. Fielding
• Intro & Question Mark Borg

Wednesday, 4 March 1998

• Rigorously defining the interaction of conditional headers Jeffrey Mogul
• new editorial(?) issue HEAD_WITH_IMS Jeffrey Mogul
• RE: looking for a browser that pipelines requests Carl Kugler

Tuesday, 3 March 1998

• RE: looking for a browser that pipelines requests David W. Morris
• RE: looking for a browser that pipelines requests Carl Kugler
• RE: looking for a browser that pipelines requests Yaron Goland
• Re: looking for a browser that pipelines requests Scott Lawrence
• Re: looking for a browser that pipelines requests Marc Slemko
• Re: looking for a browser that pipelines requests Life is hard... and then you die.

Monday, 2 March 1998

• Re: 505 response a MUST? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: 505 response a MUST? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: 505 response a MUST? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: looking for a browser that pipelines requests Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: 505 response a MUST? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Sunday, 1 March 1998

• Re: 505 response a MUST? Scott Lawrence
• looking for a browser that pipelines requests Venkat Padmanabhan

Friday, 27 February 1998

• Re: 505 response a MUST? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: 505 response a MUST? Larry Masinter
• Re: Age calculations in HTTP 1.1 11/21/97 document Scott Lawrence
• Re: Age calculations in HTTP 1.1 11/21/97 document Jeffrey Mogul

Thursday, 26 February 1998

• Streaming Excel & Word Files to IE Mark Hourani
• Re: Rev02: seek clarification on conditional headers Dave Kristol
• new editorial issue IM_IUS_412 [Was: seek clarification on conditional hdrs] Jeffrey Mogul

Wednesday, 25 February 1998

• Re: Rev02: seek clarification on conditional headers Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Why gateways? Roy T. Fielding
• new editorial issue CACHE_CONDITIONAL: [was: comments on Rev02] Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Why gateways? David W. Morris
• Re: Why gateways? Mike_Spreitzer.PARC@xerox.com
• Re: comments on HTTP/1.1 Rev02 20Feb98 Dave Kristol
• Rev02: seek clarification on conditional headers Dave Kristol
• Re: Why gateways? David W. Morris
• Re: Why gateways? Mike_Spreitzer.PARC@xerox.com
• Re: Why a chain? David W. Morris
• Re: Why a chain? Scott Lawrence
• Why gateways? Mike_Spreitzer.PARC@xerox.com
• Why a chain? Mike_Spreitzer.PARC@xerox.com
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-02.txt Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org
• Test Day 1998-02-26 Scott Lawrence

Tuesday, 24 February 1998

• Re: comments on HTTP/1.1 Rev02 20Feb98 (related to caching) Dave Kristol
• Re: comments on HTTP/1.1 Rev02 20Feb98 (related to caching) Dave Kristol
• Re: comments on HTTP/1.1 Rev02 20Feb98 (related to caching) Jeffrey Mogul
• new issue: 206-CONTENT-LENGTH[Was: comments on HTTP/1.1 Rev02 20Feb98] Jeffrey Mogul
• comments on HTTP/1.1 Rev02 20Feb98 Dave Kristol

Monday, 23 February 1998

• Age calculations in HTTP 1.1 11/21/97 document Burt Silverman
• draft-cohen-http-ext-postal-00.txt Koen Holtman
• editorial issue TRANSPARENT-PROXY. rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com

Friday, 20 February 1998

• Re: editorial issue TRANSPARENT-PROXY. Ben Laurie
• Re: Rev-02 of the HTTP/1.1 specification has been submitted... Dave Kristol

Thursday, 19 February 1998

• Rev-02 of the HTTP/1.1 specification has been submitted... jg@zorch.w3.org

Friday, 20 February 1998

• draft-cohen-http-ext-postal-00 Dave Kristol

Wednesday, 18 February 1998

• HTTP Rev-02 production has started... Jim Gettys
• New MHTML drafts Jacob Palme
• 505 response a MUST? Scott Lawrence
• editorial issue TRANSPARENT-PROXY. Jim Gettys
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-man-mec-08.txt,.ps Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org

Tuesday, 17 February 1998

• experimental status code Josh Cohen

Wednesday, 18 February 1998

• Re: This may be a stupid question ... C1corndog@aol.com

Tuesday, 17 February 1998

• Expectation Failed MUST or SHOULD? Scott Lawrence
• Test Day 1998-02-19 Scott Lawrence
• FW: I-D ACTION:draft-cohen-http-ext-postal-00.txt Josh Cohen

Monday, 16 February 1998

• Re: Security considerations from RE-AUTHENTICATION-REQUESTED David W. Morris
• Re: Security considerations from RE-AUTHENTICATION-REQUESTED Scott Lawrence
• Re: Security considerations from RE-AUTHENTICATION-REQUESTED Jim Gettys

Friday, 13 February 1998

• Re: Security considerations from RE-AUTHENTICATION-REQUESTED Scott Lawrence
• Re: Security considerations from RE-AUTHENTICATION-REQUESTED Jim Gettys
• Re: Security considerations from RE-AUTHENTICATION-REQUESTED Jim Gettys
• Re: Security considerations from RE-AUTHENTICATION-REQUESTED Koen Holtman
• Re: This may be a stupid question ... Scott Lawrence
• Re: This may be a stupid question ... Robert Olsson
• Re: SEC-CACHING editorial issue... Larry Masinter
• MULTIPART issue Roy T. Fielding
• CFP: HTTP-NG Workshop at WWW7 Jim Whitehead

Thursday, 12 February 1998

• Security considerations from RE-AUTHENTICATION-REQUESTED Jim Gettys
• Re: SEC-CACHING editorial issue... Jeffrey Mogul
• SEC-CACHING editorial issue... Jim Gettys
• Re: This may be a stupid question ... Life is hard... and then you die.

Wednesday, 11 February 1998

• Re: This may be a stupid question ... Ari Luotonen
• This may be a stupid question ... Nick Ambrose
• state-man-mec-07 Dave Kristol
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-man-mec-07.txt,.ps Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org
• Test Day 1998-02-12 Scott Lawrence
• new editorial (?) issue: IDENTITY-TE Jeffrey Mogul
• revised proposed solution for CONTENT-LENGTH Jeffrey Mogul

Monday, 9 February 1998

• Re: Removing Content-Base Jim Gettys
• Re: Server initiated connections Yiorgos Adamopoulos
• Server initiated connections Wyatt Williams

Sunday, 8 February 1998

• Re: Removing Content-Base Foteos Macrides

Saturday, 7 February 1998

• Removing Content-Base Jacob Palme

Friday, 6 February 1998

• Re: proposed solution for CONTENT-LENGTH Jeffrey Mogul

Thursday, 5 February 1998

• Re: proposed solution for CONTENT-LENGTH Ben Laurie
• Re: proposed solution for CONTENT-LENGTH Roy T. Fielding
• Re: proposed solution for CONTENT-LENGTH Life is hard... and then you die.

Wednesday, 4 February 1998

• state-man-mec-06 Dave Kristol

Tuesday, 3 February 1998

• proposed solution for CONTENT-LENGTH Jeffrey Mogul
• Test Day 1998-02-05 Scott Lawrence
• RE: Reauthentication Requested Revisited Josh Cohen
• Re: Reauthentication Requested Revisited Scott Lawrence
• RE: Reauthentication Requested Revisited Josh Cohen
• Re: Reauthentication Requested Revisited Scott Lawrence

Monday, 2 February 1998

• Re: Issue: message/http or application/http Nathaniel Borenstein
• Re: Issue: message/http or application/http Jacob Palme
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Scott Lawrence

Sunday, 1 February 1998

• Re: Issue: case-sensitive date format Roy T. Fielding

Saturday, 31 January 1998

• Income Tax Preperation afsrgnd@aol.com
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Adrien de Croy

Friday, 30 January 1998

• Re: Issue: case-sensitive date format Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Roy T. Fielding
• RE: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Adrien de Croy
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Ross Patterson
• RE: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Josh Cohen
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Adrien de Croy
• Issue: case-sensitive date format Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Issue: message/http or application/http Roy T. Fielding

Thursday, 29 January 1998

• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Ben Laurie
• RE: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Josh Cohen
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking John Franks
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Adrien de Croy
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Adrien de Croy
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking David W. Morris
• Re: Issue: message/http or application/http Jacob Palme
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Ross Patterson
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Ben Laurie
• Re: HTTP/1.1 : Chunking John Franks
• HTTP/1.1 : Chunking Adrien de Croy
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Jacob Palme

Wednesday, 28 January 1998

• Re: Issue: message/http or application/http Ned Freed
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Ned Freed
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts stef@nma.com
• Issue: message/http or application/http Roy T. Fielding
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts stef@nma.com
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Roy T. Fielding
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Roy T. Fielding
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Larry Masinter
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts John Franks
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Scott Lawrence

Tuesday, 27 January 1998

• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Jacob Palme
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Jacob Palme
• Unidentified subject! Scott Lawrence

Wednesday, 28 January 1998

• Test Day 1998-01-29 Scott Lawrence

Tuesday, 27 January 1998

• New transparent content negotiation drafts Koen Holtman
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-man-mec-06.txt,.ps Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-negotiation-06.txt Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-rvsa-v10-03.txt Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Einar Stefferud
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Albert Lunde

Monday, 26 January 1998

• t-codings and identity Ross Patterson
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Jim Gettys
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Jim Gettys
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Einar Stefferud
• Re: HTTP editorial issues (21Nov97) Jim Gettys
• Re: editoral issues raised by Ross Patterson Jim Gettys
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Jim Gettys
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Jim Gettys

Sunday, 25 January 1998

• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Jacob Palme
• FW: Reauthentication Requested Revisited Josh Cohen
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Einar Stefferud

Friday, 23 January 1998

• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Jim Gettys
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Jacob Palme
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Jim Gettys
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Scott Lawrence
• Re: MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Jim Gettys
• MHTML/HTTP 1.1 Conflicts Nick_Shelness/SSW/Lotus@lotus.com

Thursday, 22 January 1998

• Re: Minutes of 1/21 editorial teleconference... John Franks
• Re: Minutes of 1/21 editorial teleconference... John Franks
• Re: Minutes of 1/21 editorial teleconference... Scott Lawrence
• Re: Minutes of 1/21 editorial teleconference... Ben Laurie
• Re: Minutes of 1/21 editorial teleconference... Scott Lawrence

Wednesday, 21 January 1998

• Re: Some comments on Digest Auth Ross Patterson
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth David W. Morris
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth John Franks
• Re: Minutes of 1/21 editorial teleconference... Jim Gettys
• Re: Minutes of 1/21 editorial teleconference... John Franks
• Minutes of 1/21 editorial teleconference... Jim Gettys
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Paul Leach
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Paul Leach
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Paul Leach
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth David W. Morris
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth David W. Morris
• Re: Some comments on Digest Auth Scott Lawrence
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth John Franks

Tuesday, 20 January 1998

• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Vinod Valloppillil

Wednesday, 21 January 1998

• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Paul Leach

Monday, 19 January 1998

• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Yaron Goland

Tuesday, 20 January 1998

• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Paul Leach

Wednesday, 21 January 1998

• RE: Mandatory draft first revision - please comment! Yaron Goland

Tuesday, 20 January 1998

• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Paul Leach

Wednesday, 21 January 1998

• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Paul Leach
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Paul Leach

Tuesday, 20 January 1998

• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Paul Leach

Monday, 19 January 1998

• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Yaron Goland

Tuesday, 20 January 1998

• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Paul Leach

Wednesday, 21 January 1998

• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth John Franks
• Re: Digest and pipelining David W. Morris

Tuesday, 20 January 1998

• Digest and pipelining Paul Leach
• Re: Mandatory draft first revision - please comment! Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Mandatory draft first revision - please comment! Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth John Franks
• Re: Some comments on Digest Auth Ben Laurie
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Dave Kristol
• Re: Some comments on Digest Auth Ben Laurie
• Re: Has the Content-Length issue been resolved? Scott Lawrence
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Dave Kristol
• Test Day 1998-01-22 Scott Lawrence
• Re: Some comments on Digest Auth Ben Laurie

Monday, 19 January 1998

• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Yaron Goland
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Dave Kristol
• Re: New content negotiation draft available Koen Holtman
• Re: Some comments on Digest Auth Ben Laurie
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Dave Kristol
• Re: Some comments on Digest Auth John Franks
• Re: Some comments on Digest Auth Dave Kristol
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-negotiation-05.txt Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org
• Re: New content negotiation draft available Koen Holtman
• Re: Has the Content-Length issue been resolved? Life is hard... and then you die.
• Re: Some comments on Digest Auth Ben Laurie
• RE: Some comments on Digest Auth Yaron Goland

Sunday, 18 January 1998

• Re: Some suggested changes to the HTTP draft Jacob Palme
• Re: Some comments on Digest Auth David W. Morris

Saturday, 17 January 1998

• Re: Some comments on Digest Auth Ben Laurie
• Some comments on Digest Auth Yaron Goland
• Re: Some suggested changes to the HTTP draft John Franks
• Re: Some suggested changes to the HTTP draft John Franks
• Some suggested changes to the HTTP draft Jacob Palme
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Einar Stefferud

Thursday, 15 January 1998

• Deregulation of US Electricity Ni841Qdz0@big1cat.net

Saturday, 17 January 1998

• Internet-Drafts related to delta encoding in HTTP Jeffrey Mogul

Friday, 16 January 1998

• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers David W. Morris
• Re: New content negotiation draft available Ted Hardie
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jim Gettys
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jim Gettys

Thursday, 15 January 1998

• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Nick_Shelness@motorcity2.lotus.com
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Nick_Shelness@motorcity2.lotus.com
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Nick_Shelness@motorcity2.lotus.com

Friday, 16 January 1998

• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jacob Palme
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jacob Palme
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Einar Stefferud
• Re: New content negotiation draft available Mark Stemm

Thursday, 15 January 1998

• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Ross Patterson
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jim Gettys
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jacob Palme
• Has the Content-Length issue been resolved? John Franks
• New content negotiation draft available Koen Holtman
• Re: editorial glitch in section 14.19 (now IN-THEORY editorial issue) Jim Gettys
• RE: MUST use Content-Base Yaron Goland
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jim Gettys

Wednesday, 14 January 1998

• Cyber Ads lVh52Bwz5@re-searc1hes.com

Thursday, 15 January 1998

• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Einar Stefferud
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jacob Palme

Wednesday, 14 January 1998

• Re: MUST use Content-Base David W. Morris
• Re: MUST use Content-Base Foteos Macrides
• Minor errors in http/1.1 draft, rev. 01, from Ronald Tschalaer. Jim Gettys
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jacob Palme
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jacob Palme
• editoral issues raised by Ross Patterson Jim Gettys
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jacob Palme
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jacob Palme
• Re: MUST use Content-Base Koen Holtman
• Re: MUST use Content-Base Jim Gettys
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Gavin Nicol
• Correction - Test Day on the 15th Scott Lawrence
• Test Day 1998-01-14 Scott Lawrence
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jim Gettys
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Einar Stefferud

Tuesday, 13 January 1998

• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Einar Stefferud

Wednesday, 14 January 1998

• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Ben Laurie

Tuesday, 13 January 1998

• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Roy T. Fielding
• Re: MUST use Content-Base Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jim Gettys
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers David W. Morris
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Ben Laurie
• Re: Heads-up re: IPv6 addresses in URLs (from IPng-WG minutes) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jacob Palme
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Einar Stefferud
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Scott Lawrence
• RE: MUST use Content-Base David W. Morris
• RE: MUST use Content-Base Yaron Goland
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jacob Palme

Monday, 12 January 1998

• Re: Heads-up re: IPv6 addresses in URLs (from IPng-WG minutes) Bill Janssen
• Re: Heads-up re: IPv6 addresses in URLs (from IPng-WG minutes) Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Fred Douglis
• RE: Heads-up re: IPv6 addresses in URLs (from IPng-WG minutes) Jim Gettys
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jeffrey Mogul
• RE: Heads-up re: IPv6 addresses in URLs (from IPng-WG minutes) Josh Cohen
• Re: Heads-up re: IPv6 addresses in URLs (from IPng-WG minutes) Koen Holtman
• Re: Heads-up re: IPv6 addresses in URLs (from IPng-WG minutes) Ted Hardie
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Luigi Rizzo
• Heads-up re: IPv6 addresses in URLs (from IPng-WG minutes) Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Multiple Content-Location headers Jim Gettys
• Multiple Content-Location headers Jacob Palme
• RE: MUST use Content-Base Scott Lawrence
• RE: MUST use Content-Base Yaron Goland
• RE: MUST use Content-Base Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Sunday, 11 January 1998

• RE: MUST use Content-Base Yaron Goland

Thursday, 8 January 1998

• Re: [Fwd: A common registry for MIME headers?] Jacob Palme
• RE: FW: Content-MD5 comment (was digest mess) Paul Leach
• RE: MUST use Content-Base Jim Gettys
• Re: Digest mess Larry Masinter
• Re: FW: Content-MD5 comment (was digest mess) Jeffrey Mogul
• RE: Digest mess Jim Whitehead
• RE: LYNX-DEV two curiosities from IETF HTTP session. Jim Gettys
• Re: Digest mess Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
• RE: Digest mess Jim Gettys
• RE: MUST use Content-Base Jim Gettys
• RE: Digest mess Yaron Goland
• RE: FW: Digest mess Paul Leach
• RE: MUST use Content-Base Yaron Goland
• RE: Digest mess David W. Morris
• RE: Digest mess Paul Leach

Wednesday, 7 January 1998

• RE: Digest mess Ned Freed
• Re: MUST use Content-Base Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Digest mess Scott Lawrence
• Re: MUST use Content-Base Scott Lawrence
• Re: Minutes, HTTP-WG 8, 10 Dec 1997 Dave Kristol
• Re: Digest mess Dave Kristol
• Re: Minutes, HTTP-WG 8, 10 Dec 1997 Ted Hardie
• Re: MUST use Content-Base Foteos Macrides
• RE: Digest mess Jim Gettys
• RE: Digest mess Paul Leach
• Re: Minutes, HTTP-WG 8, 10 Dec 1997 Foteos Macrides
• RE: MUST use Content-Base Jim Gettys
• Marry Christmas and Happy New Year! - www.ias.hr Ivan the Mad Scientist
• Re: MUST use Content-Base Koen Holtman
• Minutes, HTTP-WG 8, 10 Dec 1997 Larry Masinter
• Re: Digest mess Scott Lawrence
• Re: MUST use Content-Base Larry Masinter
• Re: Digest mess John Franks
• Re: Digest mess Dave Kristol
• Re: Digest mess Scott Lawrence
• Re: Digest mess Ben Laurie
• RE: Digest mess Yaron Goland
• RE: MUST use Content-Base Yaron Goland
• Re: absolute URI clarification Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Digest mess Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
• Re: Digest mess Larry Masinter
• Re: Digest mess John Franks
• shipping HTTP/1.1 proxies? Dan Grillo
• RE: Digest mess Josh Cohen
• RE: LYNX-DEV two curiosities from IETF HTTP session. Josh Cohen
• Re: Digest mess Scott Lawrence
• RE: Digest mess Josh Cohen

Tuesday, 6 January 1998

• Re: Digest mess Scott Lawrence
• Re: Digest mess Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
• Re: Digest mess (fwd) John Franks
• Re: Digest mess John Franks
• Re: Digest mess Dave Kristol
• Re: Digest mess Ben Laurie
• Re: Digest mess John Franks
• Re: Digest mess Scott Lawrence
• Re: Digest mess Scott Lawrence
• Re: Digest mess John Franks
• Re: Digest mess Ben Laurie
• Re: Digest mess John Franks
• Re: Digest mess Scott Lawrence
• Re: Digest mess John Franks
• Test Day 1998-01-08 Scott Lawrence
• absolute URI clarification Richard Gray
• Re: Digest mess Scott Lawrence
• Minor editorial (?) problem(s) for Expect (section 14.47) Jeffrey Mogul

Monday, 5 January 1998

• Temporary mailing list suspended! Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: A common registry for MIME headers? Andrew Daviel
• Re: Step 1: domain matching rules Scott Lawrence
• Re: MUST use Content-Base David W. Morris
• Re: more on digest (was: Unidentified subject!) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: FW: Digest mess Roy T. Fielding
• Re: MUST use Content-Base Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Compression (was Re: your mail ) Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Hit-metering implementations Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Digest mess Ross Patterson
• Re: FW: Digest mess Jeffrey Mogul
• RE: LYNX-DEV two curiosities from IETF HTTP session. Yaron Goland

Monday, 29 December 1997

• RE: LYNX-DEV two curiosities from IETF HTTP session. Jim Gettys

Monday, 5 January 1998

• MUST use Content-Base Scott Lawrence
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-feature-reg-03.txt Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org

Monday, 29 December 1997

• RE: Proposal for new HTTP 1.1 authentication scheme Yaron Goland

Friday, 19 December 1997

• Re: Digest mess John Franks

Thursday, 18 December 1997

• Alternate HTTP-WG mailing list: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Larry Masinter

Friday, 19 December 1997

• Re: Digest mess Scott Lawrence
• Re: Digest mess John Franks
• Re: Digest mess Scott Lawrence

Monday, 5 January 1998

• RE: Digest mess Vinod Valloppillil

Sunday, 4 January 1998

• Re: Alternate HTTP-WG mailing list: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Joe Touch
• Re: Digest mess John Franks
• Compression (was Re: your mail ) Fred Douglis
• Re: your mail barog
• welcome back, you only missed "Digest mess" Larry Masinter

Saturday, 3 January 1998

• Re: Digest mess Roy T. Fielding
• Re: more on digest (was: Unidentified subject!) Roy T. Fielding
• test - please ignore Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Digest mess John Franks

Thursday, 18 December 1997

• Re: Digest mess Scott Lawrence
• RE: LYNX-DEV two curiosities from IETF HTTP session. Jim Gettys

Thursday, 1 January 1998

• Re: FW: Digest mess John C. Mallery

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 1998 08:40:03 UTC