I like the proposed format. You suggest: JG> One possible implementation of this format would be as a spreadsheet, JG> using a portable representation (such as ``comma separated values''). JG> The use of a spreadsheet would allow separate editing of the JG> requirements summary, followed by semi-automatic insertion into the JG> master copy of the HTTP/1.1 specification. It might also allow JG> semi-automatic extraction of subset requirements application to JG> specific kinds of implementations. I really like that idea, though looking at the example comma would clearly be a poor choice of separator :-). -- Scott Lawrence EmWeb Embedded Server <lawrence@agranat.com> Agranat Systems, Inc. Engineering http://www.agranat.com/Received on Thursday, 18 September 1997 14:56:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC