>>>>> "MDW" == Mark D Wood <mdw@itc.kodak.com> writes: MDW> Obviously, there are a wide range of client aspects that one MDW> might want to know about, and it probably doesn't make sense to MDW> add HTTP headers for all of them. However, since images are MDW> pretty basic, adopting a standard here would be useful. A look at the archives for this list will uncover considerable discussion of various mechanisms for passing all sorts of information about user & client preferences and capabilities, and little consensus on how or even whether this should be done. Various of these efforts will apparently proceed as efforts separate from getting the HTTP/1.1 spec stable. Without disagreeing with the idea that this would be usefull, I for one would really prefer that it not be considered as a part of the 1.1 spec. -- Scott Lawrence EmWeb Embedded Server <lawrence@agranat.com> Agranat Systems, Inc. Engineering http://www.agranat.com/Received on Thursday, 18 September 1997 08:18:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC