W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

RE: 301/302

From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 20:38:21 -0700
Message-Id: <11352BDEEB92CF119F3F00805F14F485037BC254@RED-44-MSG.dns.microsoft.com>
To: "'jg@pa.dec.com'" <jg@pa.dec.com>, Josh Cohen <josh@netscape.com>
Cc: "David W. Morris" <dwm@xpasc.com>, Lou Montulli <montulli@netscape.com>, Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>, Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4270
That is my memory as well. We have even changed the code in the browser
to that end.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	jg@pa.dec.com [SMTP:jg@pa.dec.com]
> Sent:	Friday, August 29, 1997 8:51 AM
> To:	Josh Cohen
> Cc:	David W. Morris; Lou Montulli; Ben Laurie; Larry Masinter;
> http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> Subject:	Re: 301/302
> My memory was the consensus in Munich was just to swap the codes,
> rather than crufting up the protocol more.  
> The discussion was of order:
> Either introducing a new code, or doing the swap will work fine,
> but given the cat isn't really out of the bag (yet), that people
> present preferred not to have yet another wart in the protocol.
> The people present included both apps area directors, and
> representatives
> of both Netscape and Microsoft.
> Anyone else at the meeting have a different memory of the discussion?
> 			- Jim
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 1997 20:49:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC