W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

Re: FW: revised trusted cookie spec

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 01:04:26 PDT
Message-Id: <3405310A.A77E7E9B@parc.xerox.com>
To: "Jaye, Dan" <DJaye@engagetech.com>
Cc: "'http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com'" <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4226
It was hard to separate your quotation from your statement, but I think
you said:

> My proposal does not put the privacy policy inside the state mgt 
> mechanism.  A separate PICS-Label header is used.  It merely 
> establishes how you relate cookie handling to privacy policies.  Do 
> you think it is unnecessary to establish that link (from within the 
> http protocol)?

I think a privacy policy should be more comprehensive than merely a
policy about cookie handling, so a Pics-Label header that's solely
useful for labelling cookies seems pretty useless to me.

Received on Thursday, 28 August 1997 01:09:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC