- From: Judson Valeski <valeski@netscape.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 12:47:39 -0700
- To: "'http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com'" <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "'http-state@lists.research.bell-labs.com'" <http-state@lists.research.bell-labs.com>
Consensus in Munich (which does not include many concerned with this issue) was that comment/commentURL is to be taken out of the spec, which I believe is the right thing to do. How is this formally done? Let's do it. Why it shouldn't be in RFC 2109: - RFC 2109 is concerned with the functionality of cookies/stateful sessions. - It is not the protocol's place to include this type of explanatory information to the user (if it belongs anywhere, it belongs in another spec related to privacy concerns and cookies; as suggested by Larry Misinter).
Received on Monday, 18 August 1997 12:52:26 UTC