Re: RE-VERSION

On Sat, 9 Aug 1997, John Franks wrote:

> The current specification is workable, but problematic.  All the
> issues mentioned above have, indeed, been raised before and are in
> the archives.  Emphatically denying their existence may temporarily
> silence the topic on the mailing list, but doesn't help implementors.
> The fact that the issue gets rehashed every six months might be taken
> as prima facie evidence that the design could be improved.

Yes.

Dave Morris

Received on Saturday, 9 August 1997 14:12:59 UTC