W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

Re: Using Content-Encoding and Content-Disposition together

From: Foteos Macrides <MACRIDES@sci.wfbr.edu>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 21:12:59 -0500 (EST)
To: koen@win.tue.nl
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <01IM4T12DUC2006PHS@SCI.WFBR.EDU>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4093
koen@win.tue.nl (Koen Holtman) wrote:
>Well, this is not really a case where we have to agree on what the most
>correct way is.  19.6.1 documents current practice, it is not
>normative, so if anything, it should give hints about what to do with
>current browsers.

	That section references only RFC 1806, which describes the
"attachment" and "inline" disposition types.  My recollection of
a long-ago message from Lou is that Netscape based its implementation
on the file upload RFC's "file" disposition type.  What is the
appropriate disposition type to use in HTTP Content-Disposition
headers and META elements, and can information about that be included
in 19.6.1?

 Foteos Macrides            Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research
 MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU         222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 1997 18:15:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC