Re: HTTP-WG new charter milestones

Foteos Macrides:
>
>Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com> wrote:
>>It's quite a while after the deadline for a revised charter/milestone
>>list, but here is my best estimate as to the schedule for HTTP-WG:
>
>	Would you please clarify the situation with respect to
>Koen's "safe" header draft.  That has been implemented in released
>versions of Lynx, can be implemented immediately by any server/script
>which processes form submissions with METHOD=POST, and poses no backward
>compatibility problems for UAs which haven't implemented it.  Koen and
>I both posted messages requesting this WG to move forward on that, but
>no reply has been forthcoming as yet.

Quick comment on the status of the safe draft: I submitted a new
version (draft-holtman-http-safe-02.txt) to the ID editor yesterday,
with slightly improved wording, mainly because the old one had expired.

I think that SAFE should be added to the 1.1 issue list.

>				Fote

Koen.