W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

Re: LAST CALL, "HTTP State Management Mechanism (Rev1) " to Propo

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 20:33:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199707241833.UAA24134@wsooti08.win.tue.nl>
To: Dave Kristol <dmk@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: dwm@xpasc.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3903
Dave Kristol:
>Does this wording express it adequately?:
>If the user agent allows the user to follow the [CommentURL] link [as
>part of a cookie inspection user interface], it should neither send nor
>accept a cookie until the user has completed the inspection.

I think the approach to solving this problem is wrong: the burden of
ensuring that the commentURL mechanism does not lead to
user-unfriendly or recursive situations should be on the server side.

I propose something like this:

 Servers SHOULD ensure that the user can visit the information pointed
 to by the commentURL without causing the user agent to receive
 additional Set-Cookie2 headers.  User agents SHOULD guard against the
 entering of infinite loops due to the commentURL mechanism, and MAY do
 this by disabling cookie processing when the commentURL is visited.

>Dave Kristol

Received on Thursday, 24 July 1997 11:38:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC