- From: Martin J. Duerst <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 12:36:45 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
On Tue, 22 Jul 1997, Jeffrey Mogul wrote: > I realize that some people were opposed to the introduction of qvalues > on Accept-Encoding. However, during today's editorial-group discussion > of the CONTENT-ENCODING issue, we realized that the syntax for the > various Accept-* request headers in RFC2068 is almost, but not quite, > uniform, and we reached a tentative agreement that it might be a good > idea to have all of the Accept-* request headers (Accept-Range is a > response header) have similar syntaxes. Great! I guess this might go along well with my suggestions to streamline and concentrate the explanations, too. Regards, Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 1997 04:38:27 UTC