Re: Any objections to "Accept-encoding: gzip, *;q=0"?

On Tue, 22 Jul 1997, Jeffrey Mogul wrote:

> I realize that some people were opposed to the introduction of qvalues
> on Accept-Encoding.  However, during today's editorial-group discussion
> of the CONTENT-ENCODING issue, we realized that the syntax for the
> various Accept-* request headers in RFC2068 is almost, but not quite,
> uniform, and we reached a tentative agreement that it might be a good
> idea to have all of the Accept-* request headers (Accept-Range is a
> response header) have similar syntaxes.

Great! I guess this might go along well with my suggestions to
streamline and concentrate the explanations, too.

Regards,	Martin.

Received on Wednesday, 23 July 1997 04:38:27 UTC