W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

Re: ISSUE CONTENT-ENCODING: Proposed wording

From: Josh Cohen <josh@netscape.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 20:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Roam.SIMC.>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3818
Did we include specification of which headers are allowed
in the footer? The 3.6 section indicates "only those which are
specified explicitly" but none are explicitly specified.

In the draft, there are only like 4 occurrences of the word
"footer".  And all but 1 are in 3.6..

Josh Cohen				        Netscape Communications Corp.
Netscape Fire Department	               	       #include<disclaimer.h>
Server Engineering
josh@netscape.com                       http://home.netscape.com/people/josh/
Received on Friday, 18 July 1997 20:19:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC