W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

Re: Proposed resolution for the STATUS100 issue

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 04:36:51 -0700
To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <9707180448.aa26923@paris.ics.uci.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3802 
>How about this?
>
>   o  A client MUST be prepared to accept one or more 100 (Continue)
>      status messages prior to a regular response, even if the client
>      does not expect a 100 (Continue) status message.

This should be the case for 1xx responses in general, so the
requirement should also be in general.

....Roy
Received on Friday, 18 July 1997 05:06:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC