- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 12:33:01 -0700
- To: "'koen@win.tue.nl'" <koen@win.tue.nl>
- Cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Who intends to implement it? Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: koen@win.tue.nl [SMTP:koen@win.tue.nl] > Sent: Friday, July 11, 1997 12:17 AM > To: Yaron Goland > Cc: koen@win.tue.nl; masinter@parc.xerox.com; > http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com > Subject: Re: LAST CALL, "HTTP State Management Mechanism (Rev1) " > to Propo > > Yaron Goland: > > > >That is not accurate, Microsoft is planning on implementing hit > meeting. > >I also know that AOL and Netscape have expressed interest although, > in > >so far as I am aware, neither party has committed to an > implementation. > > Ah, thanks for the information! This is the first time I hear about > any vendor planning to implement hit metering. > > >As for RFC 2109, what happens to a protocol that is broken and that > no > >one intends to implement? > > It is not broken (at least less so than Netscape cookies, which are > the current state of the art), and we have at least one implementer > who intends to implement. > > > Yaron > > Koen.
Received on Friday, 11 July 1997 12:39:41 UTC