W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

TSPECIALS: another nit

From: Graham Klyne <GK@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 16:47:42 +0100
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970711163719.00981d60@POP.Dial.Pipex.Com>
To: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3739
Sorry to raise this while you're trying to close down issues for the Munich
IETF meeting, BUT I notice that RFC 2045 and RFC 2068 contain conflicting
definitions of syntax production 'tspecials'.

RFC 2045, section 5.1, p12
RFC 2068, section 2.2, p16

Sections 3.7.2 and 16 of RFC 2068 incorporate RFC 2045 syntax productions
by reference, so not only is this a potential source of confusion but I
think it is technically ambiguous.

GK.
---

------------
Graham Klyne
GK@ACM.ORG
Received on Friday, 11 July 1997 08:58:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:02 UTC