W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

Re: Proposal: 100-Continue optional under Client control

From: Joel N. Weber II <devnull@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 16:35:00 -0400
Message-Id: <199707042035.QAA27205@mescaline.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
To: dwm@xpasc.com
Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3663

   Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
   From: "David W. Morris" <dwm@xpasc.com>
   Reply-To: "David W. Morris" <dwm@xpasc.com>

   We use the term server when we don't choose to differentiate between
   proxies and servers.

I understand what you're saying, but isn't that a circular reference?

Received on Friday, 4 July 1997 13:37:45 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David W. Morris: "Re: ISSUE PROXY-AUTHORIZATION: Proposal wording"
Previous message: Koen Holtman: "Re: ISSUE PROXY-AUTHORIZATION: Proposal wording"
In reply to: David W. Morris: "Re: Proposal: 100-Continue optional under Client control"
Next in thread: Jeffrey Mogul: "Is 100-Continue hop-by-hop?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:02 UTC