Tuesday, 1 April 1997
- Re: pipelining vs. deferred content
- Re: Age Header Field in HTTP/1.1
- Re: pipelining vs. deferred content
- Re: Age Header Field in HTTP/1.1
- Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined
- Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined
- Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined
Monday, 31 March 1997
- Random http-wg statistics
- Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined
- 1.1 server available for testing
Saturday, 29 March 1997
Friday, 28 March 1997
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- RE: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- RE: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- Re: Revised HTTP-WG agenda for April 7
- System management of HTTP clients
- Re: Suggestion: Add Cache-Control extensibility to Vary header
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
Thursday, 27 March 1997
- Re: pipelining vs. deferred content
- Revised S-HTTP draft
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- HTML "include": see WD-object [was: HTTP Connection Management]
- Re: pipelining vs. deferred content
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- Re: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show?
- Re: pipelining vs. deferred content
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt
- Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt)
- Re: pipelining vs. deferred content
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-02.txt
- Re: ID: Proxy autoconfig
- Re: pipelining vs. deferred content
- Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt)
- ID: Proxy autoconfig
- Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined
Wednesday, 26 March 1997
- Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined
- Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt)
- Re: pipelining vs. deferred content
- Re: pipelining vs. deferred content
- RE: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show?
- Re: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2
- Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt)
- pipelining vs. deferred content
- Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt)
- RE: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show?
- RE: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show?
- Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt)
- RE: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show?
- Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt)
- Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt)
- Re: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2
- Re: unverifiable transactions (was: Unidentified subject!)
- Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt)
- Re: HTTP Connection Management (draft-ietf-http-connection-00.txt)
- Re: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2
- Re: HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined
- Age Header Field in HTTP/1.1
- Re: Revised HTTP-WG agenda for April 7
- Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt
Tuesday, 25 March 1997
Wednesday, 26 March 1997
Tuesday, 25 March 1997
Wednesday, 26 March 1997
Tuesday, 25 March 1997
Wednesday, 26 March 1997
Tuesday, 25 March 1997
- Re: Unidentified subject!
- HTTP/1.1 Issue: max-age in responses not defined
- Re: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show?
- Re: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2
- On CommentURSs ....
- Re: Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show?
- Unidentified subject!
- Re: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2
- Re: RFC2109 addition...
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-rvsa-v10-01.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-pep-02.txt
- Re: RFC2109 addition...
- Re: Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2
- Re: cookie Port summary
- Should server beable to say NoCookie, No Show?
- Re: RFC2109 addition...
- Re: RFC2109 addition...
- Re: cookie Port summary
- Re: RFC2109 addition...
- Re: RFC2109 addition...
- RE: RFC2109 addition...
- Re: RFC2109 addition...
- Re: RFC2109 addition...
- Re: RFC2109 addition...
Monday, 24 March 1997
Tuesday, 25 March 1997
- Re: RFC2109 addition...
- FYI: New IETF WEBDAV Working Group
- Section 10.1.1 Combining Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2
- Re: RFC2109 addition...
- RFC2109 addition...
Monday, 24 March 1997
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: cookie Port summary
- RE: cookie Port summary
- Re: cookie Port summary
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: cookie Port summary
- Re: cookie Port summary
- cookie Port summary
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- Re: Process for closing out issues list
- Re: Issues with the cookie draft
- Re: 305 Use proxy
- Process for closing out issues list
- RE: new cookie draft
- Re: 305 Use proxy
- RE: 305 Use proxy
Sunday, 23 March 1997
- RE: new cookie draft
- RE: new cookie draft
- Re: 305 Use proxy
- RE: new cookie draft
- RE: new cookie draft
- Some issues for the list
- Re: 305 Use proxy
- Re: 305 Use proxy
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- Transparent content negotiation pointers & status
- Re: Issues with the cookie draft
- RE: Issues with the cookie draft
- RE: Issues with the cookie draft
- RE: Issues with the cookie draft
- RE: Issues with the cookie draft
- RE: new cookie draft
Saturday, 22 March 1997
- RE: new cookie draft
- RE: Issues with the cookie draft
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- RE: new cookie draft
- RE: Issues with the cookie draft
- RE: new cookie draft
- RE: new cookie draft
- Re: 305 Use proxy
- RE: new cookie draft
- RE: Issues with the cookie draft
- RE: new cookie draft
Friday, 21 March 1997
- RE: new cookie draft
- RE: Issues with the cookie draft
- Secure cookies survey
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- RE: Issues with the cookie draft
- Re: New Issue: Incompatiblity between caching needs and persistant connections.
- Re: New Issue: Incompatiblity between caching needs and persistant connections.
- Re: new cookie draft
- Re: new cookie draft
- Re: new cookie draft
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- New Issue: Incompatiblity between caching needs and persistant connections.
- Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- RE: new cookie draft
- RE: Issues with the cookie draft
- Whats servlets for?
- Safe: Yes now, GETWBODY later? [was: Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt]
- Re: http-equiv and new http headers
- Re: new cookie draft
- RE: new cookie draft
- Re: deflate
Thursday, 20 March 1997
- Re: Secure cookies survey
- Re: 305 Use proxy
- Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt
- Re: deflate
- Re: http-equiv and new http headers
- Re: Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore
- deflate
- Re: new cookie draft
- Re: determining proxy reliability
- Administrivia: getting off this list
- Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt
- Re: new cookie draft
- Re: Secure cookies survey
- Re: determining proxy reliability
- Re: 305 Use proxy
- Secure cookies survey
- Re: Issues with the cookie draft
- cookies -- by the way
- new cookie draft
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-uahint-00.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-warning-00.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-man-mec-00.txt, .ps
- RE: 305 Use proxy
- Re: Issues with the cookie draft
- Re: determining proxy reliability
- Re: 305 Use proxy
- Re: 305 Use proxy
Wednesday, 19 March 1997
- Re: Issues with the cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Issues with the cookie draft
- Re: Issues with the cookie draft
- Re: Issues with the cookie draft
- Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore
- http-equiv and new http headers
- ID: wildcards in Accept-Charset
- Re: Cookies and cache
- Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt
- Re: Issues with the cookie draft
- Re: determining proxy reliability
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
Monday, 17 March 1997
Tuesday, 18 March 1997
Wednesday, 19 March 1997
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Warning: Rant Enclo sed)
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Warning: Rant Enclosed)
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft (Warning: Rant Enclo sed)
- Re: Issues with the cookie draft
- Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Issues with the cookie draft
- Re: Issues with the cookie draft
- Re: 305 Use proxy
- Issues with the cookie draft
- cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
Tuesday, 18 March 1997
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- 305 Use proxy
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Cookies and cache
- determining proxy reliability
- Re: Re[2]: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re[2]: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Cookies and cache
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt
- Re: Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore Expires?
- Re: draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- draft-holtman-http-safe-01.txt
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- "DoubleClick Tries to Force Hand into Cookie Jar"
- State Mgmt/RFC 2109 plans
- Re: Confused about persistent connection for old clients
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Agenda for HTTP working group April 7
- Re: Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore Expires?
- Re: Confused about persistent connection for old clients
Monday, 17 March 1997
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- UA Hint Proposal ... Interim Draft
- Re: HTTP/1.1 issue: Proxy-Authorization
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore Expires?
Sunday, 16 March 1997
- Re: Suggestion: Add Cache-Control extensibility to Vary header
- Re: Suggestion: Add Cache-Control extensibility to Vary header
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Confused about persistent connection for old clients
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
Saturday, 15 March 1997
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore Expires?
- IETF HTTP-WG agenda
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Fact-checking: do any in-service proxy caches ever ignore Expires?
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
Friday, 14 March 1997
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: HTTP/1.1 issue: Proxy-Authorization
- Re: HTTP/1.1 issue: Proxy-Authorization
- HTTP/1.1 issue: Proxy-Authorization
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-versions-01.txt
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Re: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Cacheing encrypted objects
- RE: Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
- Unverifiable Transactions / Cookie draft
Thursday, 13 March 1997
- Suggestion: Add Cache-Control extensibility to Vary header
- Updated issues list...
- Re: What method for Location?
- RE: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached
- Re: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached
- RE: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached
Wednesday, 12 March 1997
- RE: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached
- Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- RE: URI or URL? [was: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached]
- URI or URL? [was: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached]
- Re: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached
- Re: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached
- mailto:http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
- Re: What method for Location?
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-negotiation-01.txt
- mailto:http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
- RE: PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached
- Re: What method for Location?
Tuesday, 11 March 1997
- Re: What method for Location?
- What method for Location?
- Re: Metadata proliferation
- Re: Metadata proliferation
- Re: Metadata proliferation
- PEP draft delayed -- diffs so far attached
Monday, 10 March 1997
Sunday, 9 March 1997
- Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- New content negotiation draft available
- Re: Metadata proliferation
Saturday, 8 March 1997
- Re: Metadata proliferation
- Metadata proliferation
- Re: copyright issues for proxy caches and archival services
Friday, 7 March 1997
Thursday, 6 March 1997
Wednesday, 5 March 1997
- Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- Request for Input and Progress on PEP draft
- RE: The state of cookies
- Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- copyright issues for proxy caches and archival services
Tuesday, 4 March 1997
- Re: The state of cookies
- Re: Internet Draft http-versions-00
- HTTP/1.1 - Retry-after for 3xx as well as 503?
- Re: The state of cookies
- Re: Internet Draft http-versions-00
- Content-Range and Caching Proxies
- Re: The state of cookies
- Re: Internet Draft http-versions-00
Monday, 3 March 1997
- HTTP tutorial online (1.0 and 1.1)
- Re: cookies: 2/4 headers?
- Re: cookies: 2/4 headers?
- Re: The state of cookies
- Re: The state of cookies
- Re: cookies: 2/4 headers?
- Authentication-Info in Chunked Footer
Sunday, 2 March 1997
Saturday, 1 March 1997
- Re: cookies: 2/4 headers?
- Re: The state of cookies
- Re: cookies: 2/4 headers?
- The state of cookies
- Now available: extensive HTTP proxy traces from DECWRL
Friday, 28 February 1997
- Re: [Fwd: SEC - Protocol names for security protocols]
- [Fwd: SEC - Protocol names for security protocols]
- Internet Draft http-versions-00
- Memphis scheduling
- Re: What is the basic idea behind 305 Use Proxy?
Thursday, 27 February 1997
- Authentication-Info in Chunked Footer
- Unicode Conference - Final Reminder
- Re: Apache and HTTP/1.1
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- RE: Comments on the new cookie draft
Wednesday, 26 February 1997
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- RE: Comments on the new cookie draft
- RE: Using of Connection header
- Some edits to draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- RE: Using of Connection header
Tuesday, 25 February 1997
Monday, 24 February 1997
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- Cookies in the news
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- LWS in quoted-string
- What is the basic idea behind 305 Use Proxy?
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- RE: Comments on the new cookie draft
- hit metering: wait until next draft?
Sunday, 23 February 1997
- Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-00.txt
- Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt
Saturday, 22 February 1997
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- RE: Content encoding problem...
- RE: Comments on the new cookie draft
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- Re: Content encoding problem...
Friday, 21 February 1997
- RE: Padding size in chunked encoding
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- RE: Comments on the new cookie draft
- RE: Padding size in chunked encoding
- Re: Padding size in chunked encoding
- RE: Padding size in chunked encoding
- Re: Padding size in chunked encoding
- RE: Padding size in chunked encoding
- Re: Comments on the new cookie draft
- Re: Apache and HTTP/1.1
- Apache and HTTP/1.1
- Padding size in chunked encoding
- Apache and HTTP/1.1
- RE: Apache Group
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Comments on the new cookie draft
Thursday, 20 February 1997
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Questions on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Questions on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- RE: Apache Group
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- RE: Apache Groupy
- Re: Apache Groupy
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
Wednesday, 19 February 1997
- Re: Claification requested in Host:
- Re: Claification requested in Host:
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Claification requested in Host:
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Negotiation comments
- Re: Claification requested in Host:
- Re: PEP and new methods
- Re: Claification requested in Host:
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Claification requested in Host:
- Re: Claification requested in Host:
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- Re: Claification requested in Host:
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Apache and HTTP/1.1
- Re: PEP and new methods
- Apache and HTTP/1.1
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- PEP and new methods
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- RFC 2109 on HTTP State Management Mechanism
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- Re: Apache Group
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- Re: Apache Group
- Pipelining and compression effect on HTTP/1.1 proxies
- Negotiation comments
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- HTTP/1.1 Issues list
- Apache Group
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Content-Location in HTTP/1.1 text
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Content-Location in HTTP/1.1 text
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- Re: SHOULD we include charset=ISO-8859-1?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- Re: SHOULD we include charset=ISO-8859-1?
- Re: Comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
Tuesday, 18 February 1997
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-00.txt
- Ted Hardie's comments on draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-01.txt
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: new prospective cookie draft
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: new prospective cookie draft
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- SHOULD we include charset=ISO-8859-1?
- Re: HTTP/1.1 in the news
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Comments on draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Re: new prospective cookie draft
Friday, 14 February 1997
Monday, 17 February 1997
- Re: Calendaring Interoperability over HTTP
- new prospective cookie draft
- Re: HTTP/1.1 in the news
- Re: HTTP/1.1 in the news
- Re: HTTP/1.1 in the news
- Re: HTTP/1.1 in the news
- Re: HTTP/1.1 in the news
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- HTTP/1.1 in the news
- Cookies
Sunday, 16 February 1997
- Re: HTTP WG status, scheduling
- RE: Content encoding problem...
- Comments on draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-00.txt
- Re: HTTP WG status, scheduling
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- Re: Cookie Question
- Re: Cookie Question
- Re: Cookie Question
- Re: Cookie Question
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- revised HTTP-WG charter
- Re: Cookie Question
- Re: Cookie Question
- Re: Cookie Question
- HTTP WG status, scheduling
Saturday, 15 February 1997
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: Content encoding problem...
- Re: Claification requested in Host:
Friday, 14 February 1997
- Re: Cookie Question
- Re: Cookie Question
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: Claification requested in Host:
- Re: How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: Cookie Question
- Re: Cookie Question
- Re: Cookie Question
- Content encoding problem...
- Re: Cookie Question
- Re: Claification requested in Host:
- Cookie Question
- How to add new "protocols" ?
- Re: Claification requested in Host:
- Re: errata for cookie spec
- Re: errata for cookie spec
- Erratum for draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
- Claification requested in Host:
- Re: errata for cookie spec
Thursday, 13 February 1997
- Re: errata for cookie spec
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PEP draft for review]
- Re: errata for cookie spec
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PEP draft for review]
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PEP draft for review]
Tuesday, 11 February 1997
- [Fwd: Re: PEP draft for review]
- Calendaring Interoperability over HTTP
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-rvsa-v10-00.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-negotiation-00.txt
Monday, 10 February 1997
Saturday, 8 February 1997
Friday, 7 February 1997
Thursday, 6 February 1997
- Re: errata for cookie spec
- Re: errata for cookie spec
- Re[2]: errata for cookie spec
- Re: errata for cookie spec
- Re: errata for cookie spec
- Re: errata for cookie spec
- Re: errata for cookie spec
- Re: errata for cookie spec
- Re: errata for cookie spec
Wednesday, 5 February 1997
- Re: errata for cookie spec
- errata for cookie spec
- Re: Content ranges in HTTP/1.1
- Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results
- Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results
- Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results
- Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results
- Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results
- Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results
- Re: Translated IUC10 Web pages: Experimental Results
- New content negotiation drafts available
Tuesday, 4 February 1997
- Web pages in twenty languages + Unicode
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-errata-00.txt, .ps
- PEP draft for review
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-pep-01.txt
- Cache-control: proxy-maxage as MUST for HTTP/1.1?
- Content ranges in HTTP/1.1
Monday, 3 February 1997
- Unicode Conference - March 1997 - Reminder
- Re: HTTP events at www6 conference?
- Re: HTTP events at www6 conference?
- Re: HTTP events at www6 conference?
- HTTP events at www6 conference?
- Re: Persistent connections: current implementations?
Friday, 31 January 1997
- Unidentified subject!
- Re: Hit-meter draft (was Unidentified subject!)
- Re: draft-ietf-http-versions-00.txt
- draft-mogul-http-revalidate-00.txt
Wednesday, 29 January 1997
Tuesday, 28 January 1997
Monday, 27 January 1997
Friday, 24 January 1997
Thursday, 23 January 1997
- Netscape's Marc Andreessen on Unicode + the Web
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-00.txt
- Re: Semantics of Content-Range in the PUT method
- Semantics of Content-Range in the PUT method
Wednesday, 22 January 1997
Monday, 20 January 1997
Saturday, 18 January 1997
Wednesday, 15 January 1997
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header
Tuesday, 14 January 1997
- RE: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- I-D ACTION:draft-mogul-http-revalidate-00.txt
Monday, 13 January 1997
- Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header
- Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header
- Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header
Saturday, 11 January 1997
Friday, 10 January 1997
- Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header
- Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header
- Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header
- HTTP/1.1 (RFC 2068) wording nit
- Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header
- Re: A broken browser
Thursday, 9 January 1997
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- Tenth Int'l Unicode Conference - March 1997
- Accept-Language prefix matching (was: A broken browser)
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header
Wednesday, 8 January 1997
- Hello!
- Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
Tuesday, 7 January 1997
Monday, 6 January 1997
- Re: question on 14.9.4, no-cache directive in requests
- Re: question on 14.9.4, no-cache directive in requests
- question on 14.9.4, no-cache directive in requests
- Re: Cache-Control directive, semantics
Saturday, 4 January 1997
Sunday, 29 December 1996
Friday, 27 December 1996
Saturday, 28 December 1996
Friday, 27 December 1996
Saturday, 28 December 1996
Friday, 27 December 1996
Saturday, 28 December 1996
Friday, 3 January 1997
Thursday, 2 January 1997
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- RE: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- RE: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: RFC 2068 and 2069!
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: RFC 2068 and 2069!
- Re: RFC 2068 and 2069!
- RFC 2068 and 2069!
- Re: Cache-Control directive, semantics
- Re: HTTP response version, again
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- Re: A broken browser
- A broken browser
Wednesday, 1 January 1997
- Re: Cache-Control directive, semantics
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version
- Re: Call for Closure - HTTP response version