- From: Dave Kristol <dmk@bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 15:02:24 -0400
- To: http-state@lists.research.bell-labs.com
- Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
I've submitted a new Internet Draft to appear soon (I hope): draft-ietf-http-state-man-mec-02. You can take a look at it now via <http://portal.research.bell-labs.com/~dmk/cookie-ver.html>. You can find versions there with change-bars from the previous I-D or from RFC 2109. This I-D addresses a serious flaw in RFC 2109's wording concerning third-party cookies and unverifiable transactions that was even more restrictive than we intended: When it makes an unverifiable transaction, a user agent must enable a session only if a cookie with a domain attribute D was sent or accepted in its origin transaction, such that the host name in the Request-URI of the unverifiable transaction domain-matches D. The words "cookie ... in its origin transaction" make it sounds like we require there to have been a cookie in the origin transaction or else a session cannot be initiated via an unverifiable transaction (in addition to the other restrictions). Koen Holtman and I have batted words around for several weeks now (seriously slowed by my involvement with LPWA (see <http://lpwa.com>)), but things have finally stabilized enough for me to attend to this loose end. Dave Kristol P.S. Although I've Cc-ed http-wg as a courtesy, let's try to keep discussion on http-state.
Received on Thursday, 19 June 1997 12:05:53 UTC