- From: Graham Klyne <GK@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 23:01:28 +0100
- To: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com, ietf-fax@imc.org
I was in discussion yesterday with the developer of a system which provides message redirection based on the current working location of the recipient of a message. For example, a person might be working in an office, from home or in a distant hotel at different times. Fax messages to that person can be directed to a departmental fax machine in the office or to a dynamic Web page to be viewed using a browser, depending upon the location of the recipient at that time. This suggests to me that it might be desirable to tag negotiable features as 'transient' as a warning to intermediate systems to avoid caching these (negotiable feature) values in an attempt to 'optimize' future negotiations. I see this as an extension of the idea by Joffe/Wing/Kline of tagging negotiable features as 'authoritative'. The idea of transient features might be particularly relevant if a directory or other mechanism is used to cache previously offered negotiation features to speed up negotiation in future communications. This idea is probably more applicable to message passing in a store-and-forward environment where the imperative is to avoid round-trip delays. But I believe that the distinction between 'online' messaging (like HTTP) and s/f messaging is more one of degree than fundamental difference, and mechanisms good for one may be applicable to the other. GK. --- ------------ Graham Klyne GK@ACM.ORG
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 1997 15:53:05 UTC