- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@kiwi.ICS.UCI.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 14:34:02 -0700
- To: John Franks <john@math.nwu.edu>
- Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
>You didn't comment on these suggested changes though and I >would be interested in your thoughts. I am not interested in tying HTTP requirements to TCP implementation details. I didn't even support introducing all the noise in section 8 (it belongs in an implementation guide, not the protocol spec). The 100 code was intended to solve an application requirement of not sending the data before determining whether or not the server requires encryption or re-encoding of that data. Since Dave's idea (not yet in proposal form) would satisfy that requirement, it meets the needs of the protocol without concern for implementation context. ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 1997 14:49:46 UTC