- From: Robert Herriot <Robert.Herriot@eng.sun.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 12:34:16 -0700
- To: rdebry@us.ibm.com, lawrence@agranat.com
- Cc: ipp@pwg.org, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
> From lawrence@agranat.com Wed Apr 30 11:51:49 1997 > My original reply seems to have started an interesting thread on the > subject on the http-wg list; I'll let you know how it comes out, but > the opinion that the HTTP Content-Length header may be used for each > part of a multipart/* seems to be well supported. It would be good to get a definitive answer as to whether Content-Length takes priority over the boundary string in a multipart/*. At a recent IETF meeting I asked such a question to some knowledgeable person who said that Content-Length was ignored in this context and that the boundary string was the only way to determine the end of a part in a multipart/*. I would prefer that Content-Length take priority if it is present.
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 1997 12:44:46 UTC