- From: Ross Patterson <Ross_Patterson@ns.reston.vmd.sterling.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 97 18:17:14 EDT
- To: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com writes: > At the Memphis meeting, I briefly discussed the fact that many > systems where our 1.1 server implementation will be used do not (and > will not) have clocks, so sending the Date header is problematic. While I understand and sympathize with the issue here (I've already got too many clocks in my home, I don't need more to reset twice a year!), I find it suprising that TCP can be implemented on a system that has no timing facilities. For that matter, don't many (most?) embedded systems have a real-time kernel, with a timer-based dispatcher? Or am I mistaking a timer for a time-of-day-and-date clock? Ross Patterson Sterling Software, Inc. VM Software Division
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 1997 15:24:54 UTC