- From: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 97 10:18:15 MDT
- To: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
The draft minutes say:
-- Jeff Mogul will respond to syntactic changes proposed by Koen
Holtman for the HTTP-warning draft; if appropriate, a new version
of the draft will appear.
Koen and I discussed this briefly at WWW6, and then he was offline
for a week. We've now agreed that no change is necessary, since the
original proposal in draft-ietf-http-warning-00.txt actually already
addressed his concern.
This means that as far as we're concerned, the proposal in
draft-ietf-http-warning-00.txt is ready for "last call" and,
if nobody objects, to be applied as edits to the text in RFC2068.
-Jeff
P.S.: draft-ietf-http-warning-00.txt contains a Note (on page 10)
to the effect that we could save some bytes by defining a modified
version of the HTTP-date format ... but Koen and I agree that this is
probably not worth doing for HTTP/1.1. This explanatory Note is not
part of the actual proposed edits, and so should not delay any WG action.
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 1997 10:24:49 UTC