David W. Morris wrote: > On Sat, 21 Dec 1996 S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: > > > My browser keeps a list of sites recently visited and their HTTP version > > precisely so it can avoid confusing them. > > What will it do in the future when an HTTP/1.2 site declares itself? Treat it as a 1.1 server and send it 1.1 requests, since the major version matches (it is 1) and the minor version is >= 1. Obviously, if a process starts to define HTTP/1.2 I'll look at adding an implementation of it. > Until this discussion started, my interpretation was that n HTTP/1.0 > request should always receive HTTP/1.0 in the status line. I don't agree - but I don't have the documents here to back myself up. -- Stewart Brodie, Electronics & Computer Science, Southampton University. http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~snb94r/ http://delenn.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Received on Sunday, 22 December 1996 04:13:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:00 UTC