W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 1996

Re: HTTP response version, again

From: M. Hedlund <hedlund@best.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 15:34:20 -0800 (PST)
To: Daniel DuBois <dan@spyglass.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.95.961220153018.4054B-100000@shellx.best.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/2142 

On Fri, 20 Dec 1996, Daniel DuBois wrote:
> Well, I agree with Ted.  Do #2 and fix the broken clients/proxies.

If it were only proxies, I would agree, but fixing broken clients is a lot
harder (that is, getting client users to upgrade is harder than getting
proxy maintainers to do so).  It seems imminently desirable to ease
protocol upgrades, and case #1 would do so.

Marc Hedlund <hedlund@best.com>
Received on Friday, 20 December 1996 15:42:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:00 UTC