W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 1996

Re: Accept-Charset support

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 12:59:21 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199612081159.MAA16734@wsooti08.win.tue.nl>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: kweide@tezcat.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-international@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/2046
Larry Masinter:
>Perhaps one of the requirements for 'feature registration' should be a
>that the registration form contain N different URLs where the content
>actually differs depending on whether the feature is or is not
>At least then others would have some test cases.

We certainly thought about such a requirement when we were writing the
document, but we could not figure out how to put it in.

The problem is that, if these N different URLs already exist, this would be
proof that negotiation on the feature can already be done without
registering a new feature tag.

In general, it is hard to add an `actual usefullness' requirement without
having a review board in the loop, and we don't want to have a review board.

We do have the following field in the registration form:

   Applications or sites which will use this feature tag:       [optional]

    | For applications, also specify the number of the first version
    | which will use the tag.

the idea is that, if the author leaves this blank, this would be a good
warning sign that you should not take the tag too seriously.


Received on Sunday, 8 December 1996 04:03:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:00 UTC