- From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@appliedtheory.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 13:55:47 -0500 (EST)
- To: http working group <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Folks, re: draft-mogul-http-hit-metering-00.txt This is very a minor issue. > 5.2 Abbreviations for Meter directives > To allow for the most efficient possible encoding of Meter headers, > we define abbreviated forms of all Meter directives. These are Didn't we just go through this with 1.1? I think consistency in the protocol is an important consideration. Either it should be a human readable protocol, or a binary machine optimized protocol.. defining synonyms for terms seems to add nothing but confusion. I think the abbreviations are un-necessary especially when you consider the excellent job Jeff and Paul did at making sure that the default (empty) conditions of meter: are the common cases. Further condensation seems like a fool-hardy optimization. While I'm willing to trade simplicity for some reasons, I don't find the argument compelling enough here. -Patrick -- Patrick R. McManus - Applied Theory Communications - Software Engineering http://pat.appliedtheory.com/~mcmanus Programmer Analyst mcmanus@AppliedTheory.com 'Prince of Pollywood' Standards, today! *** - You Kill Nostalgia, Xenophobic Fears. It's Now or Neverland. - ***
Received on Thursday, 21 November 1996 17:02:18 UTC