- From: Fisher Mark <FisherM@is3.indy.tce.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Nov 96 12:35:00 EST
- To: Ron Daniel <rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
>How about: > 1) We define text/uri-list as a new media type? > 2) We allow the Accept: header to be used to pick between returning > the result as text/html or text/uri-list. > >I think that the primary use of the lists will be for automated processing, >thus the new media type allows us to launch those content handlers easily. >Clients that don't support text/uri-list have a fallback that will allow >humans to pick URI if necessary. New clients of the agent variety should >use text/uri-list. Sounds OK to me. Automated processing is important! ====================================================================== Mark Leighton Fisher Thomson Consumer Electronics fisherm@indy.tce.com Indianapolis, IN
Received on Monday, 4 November 1996 09:41:54 UTC