W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 1996

status code 100 (continue)

From: <rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 15:01:27 EST
Message-Id: <199610301951.OAA47548@rtpdce01.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1869
The way I read section 8.2 (message transmission requirements) is: 
IF ((client is 1.1) AND (NOT connection:close)) then I MUST send 
status 100 or an error. 
Will clients get confused receiving 100 even if connection:close? 
Do I *really* have to send a Date header? 
(Well, according to 14.19 I do, but that is for caching, and as far as 
I can tell, only terminal stupidity - in the form of a cache-control 
directive - will cause a 100 response to be cached). 
And, (once again) what is the rationale for the 100 response? 
It seems unnecessary and wasteful; what am I missing here? 

Thank You, 
Richard L. Gray
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 1996 12:02:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:00 UTC