W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 1996

Re: content-disposition header

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 13:40:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199610101140.NAA05879@wsooti09.win.tue.nl>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1736
Roy T. Fielding:
>> Should content-disposition from RFC 1806 be considered for HTTP?
>As a MIME entity-header, I already consider it to be in HTTP.
>The same goes for content-description (a.k.a. Title).
>The real question is whether (or how) it should be described
>within the next HTTP spec.
>I think it falls into the "damned if we do; damned if we don't" category. ;)

That means it would fit perfectly into appendix 19.6.2 (Additional
Header Field Definitions).  Putting it into 19.6.2 seems like a good
way to record current practice.


Received on Thursday, 10 October 1996 04:50:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:00 UTC