Re: content-disposition header

Roy T. Fielding:
>
>> Should content-disposition from RFC 1806 be considered for HTTP?
>
>As a MIME entity-header, I already consider it to be in HTTP.
>The same goes for content-description (a.k.a. Title).
>The real question is whether (or how) it should be described
>within the next HTTP spec.
>
>I think it falls into the "damned if we do; damned if we don't" category. ;)

That means it would fit perfectly into appendix 19.6.2 (Additional
Header Field Definitions).  Putting it into 19.6.2 seems like a good
way to record current practice.

>.....Roy

Koen.