Roy T. Fielding: > >> Should content-disposition from RFC 1806 be considered for HTTP? > >As a MIME entity-header, I already consider it to be in HTTP. >The same goes for content-description (a.k.a. Title). >The real question is whether (or how) it should be described >within the next HTTP spec. > >I think it falls into the "damned if we do; damned if we don't" category. ;) That means it would fit perfectly into appendix 19.6.2 (Additional Header Field Definitions). Putting it into 19.6.2 seems like a good way to record current practice. >.....Roy Koen.Received on Thursday, 10 October 1996 04:50:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:00 UTC