> Should content-disposition from RFC 1806 be considered for HTTP? Im alredy using it in some HTTP bulk transfer applications, and it certainly seems to work. the inline/attachment distinction is a bit meaningless, but it's a nice standard way to send filename and other info. Im not on http-wg, so please CC me if there's any new params proposed or the like that would make it HTTP-friendly. Ive been hideously delinquent in cutting the next version of the RFC; Ill get off my posterior now. -RensReceived on Wednesday, 9 October 1996 09:10:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:00 UTC