- From: Rens Troost <rens@name.net>
- Date: Wed, 09 Oct 1996 09:24:40 -0400
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, sdorner@qualcomm.com, rens@century.com
> Should content-disposition from RFC 1806 be considered for HTTP? Im alredy using it in some HTTP bulk transfer applications, and it certainly seems to work. the inline/attachment distinction is a bit meaningless, but it's a nice standard way to send filename and other info. Im not on http-wg, so please CC me if there's any new params proposed or the like that would make it HTTP-friendly. Ive been hideously delinquent in cutting the next version of the RFC; Ill get off my posterior now. -Rens
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 1996 09:10:39 UTC