Larry Masinter: > >Why not have 'feature' registration work the same way as 'media type' >registration in IANA, rather than inventing another mechanism? ??? We are already planning to do this. Some time ago, we were discussing it with you in private e-mail. I hope that we will be able to finish a feature registration draft within a week. We have been working on the core feature set first; it is hard to define a good feature registration form if you don't have some specific features to try as test-cases. >See, for example, > draft-ietf-822ext-mime-reg-04.txt Yes, this is the draft we are using as a basis. [...] >Some of the features listed are media type specific (html tables); >others are independent of media type and cut across those boundaries >(color, size). Shouldn't those be sorted out? What do you mean by sorting them out? The use of specific naming conventions which indicate scope? I don't know yet if we need something like a predefined set of feature prefixes. MIME types have such a prefix set and USENET newsgroups have such a prefix set, so maybe feature tags also need one. However, at this point I have no idea what would have to be in the prefix set for feature tags. >Regards, > >Larry Koen.Received on Saturday, 5 October 1996 16:16:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:00 UTC