Monday, 30 September 1996
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: REPOST (was: HTTP working group status & issues)
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: BIG APOLOGY re: PEP & revised PEP status
 
Saturday, 28 September 1996
Friday, 27 September 1996
- Re: REPOST (was: HTTP working group status & issues)
 - Re: REPOST (was: HTTP working group status & issues)
 - Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 - REPOST (was: HTTP working group status & issues)
 - Re: safe reload POST?
 - Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 - Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 - Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 - Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 - Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 - Re: safe reload POST?
 - Re: safe reload POST?
 
Thursday, 26 September 1996
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: safe reload POST?
 - Re: wording nits: draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - wording nits: draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
 - Re: Apache and cookies
 - Re: safe reload POST?
 - Re: Apache and cookies
 - Re: Apache and cookies
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: Idempotence
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Apache and cookies
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Idempotence
 - Re: safe reload POST?
 - BIG APOLOGY re: PEP & revised PEP status
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: safe reload POST?
 - Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 
Wednesday, 25 September 1996
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: safe reload POST?
 - Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 - Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 - safe reload POST?
 - meeting at Dec 9-13 IETF in San Jose?
 
Tuesday, 24 September 1996
- Re: Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 - Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 - Summary of opinions on Negotiate header
 - Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 - HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
 
Monday, 23 September 1996
Sunday, 22 September 1996
Friday, 20 September 1996
Thursday, 19 September 1996
- Re: Comments on new conneg draft
 - Re: idempotence of POST
 - Re: idempotence of POST
 - Re: idempotence of POST
 - Re: idempotence of POST
 - Re: idempotence of POST
 - RE: idempotence of POST
 - Re: idempotence of POST
 - Re: idempotence of POST
 - Re: idempotence of POST
 - Re: idempotence of POST
 - Re: idempotence of POST
 - Re: idempotence of POST
 - idempotence of POST
 
Wednesday, 18 September 1996
Tuesday, 17 September 1996
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
 - new digest-authentication internet draft submitted
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
 
Monday, 16 September 1996
- Re: Comments on new conneg draft
 - Call for Papers - Global Internet - IEEE Communications Magazine
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
 
Sunday, 15 September 1996
- Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
 
Saturday, 14 September 1996
- HTTP/1.1 draft 12 aug 1996 and content encodings
 - Conversion Program
 - Opinions on Editorial Revisions to Digest Authentication Spec
 
Friday, 13 September 1996
Thursday, 12 September 1996
- Distributed Authoring Requirements Draft
 - Comments on new conneg draft
 - Re: Authenticated Transactions: Why Wait Another Year?
 - Re: Editorial Revisions to Digest Authentication Spec
 
Wednesday, 11 September 1996
Tuesday, 10 September 1996
- I-D ACTION:draft-holtman-http-negotiation-03.txt
 - Re: Authenticated Transactions: Why Wait Another Year?
 
Monday, 9 September 1996
Saturday, 7 September 1996
Friday, 6 September 1996
- Re: Handling ambiguous requests
 - Re: Handling ambiguous requests
 - PEP name space collisions
 - PEP conflicting semantics
 - Content negotiation draft 03 available
 - Handling ambiguous requests
 - Re: Handling ambiguous requests
 - Re: Handling ambiguous requests
 
Thursday, 5 September 1996
- Handling ambiguous requests
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 
Wednesday, 4 September 1996
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: HTTP working group status
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - HTTP working group status
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 
Tuesday, 3 September 1996
Friday, 30 August 1996
- Re: Question on Chunk-Size sect 3.6, 8/12/96
 - Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
 - Protocol Action: A Proposed Extension to HTTP : Digest Access Authentication to Proposed Standard
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Protocol Action: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1 to Proposed Standard
 - Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
 - Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
 - Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
 - Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
 - Re: Question on Chunk-Size sect 3.6, 8/12/96
 - resolution of digest issue
 - Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
 - Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
 - Re: Question on Chunk-Size sect 3.6, 8/12/96
 - Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
 - Small Detail on Chunked Encoding
 - Question on Chunk-Size sect 3.6, 8/12/96
 
Thursday, 29 August 1996
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
 - Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest
 - Re: FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
 - FYI, resolution of "Digest" issue
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 - Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
 - Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
 - Re: Digest Auth (fwd)
 - Digest Auth (fwd)
 
Wednesday, 28 August 1996
- Re: digest vs basic
 - Re: digest vs basic
 - Re: digest vs basic
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: Syntax and sticky/compressed headers.
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 
Tuesday, 27 August 1996
- Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 - image transfer?
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: Netscape vs. Digest
 - Syntax and sticky/compressed headers.
 - Netscape vs. Digest (?)
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 - Re: HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 
Monday, 26 August 1996
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
 - Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
 - Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
 - Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
 - Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
 - HTTP/1.1 + Digest
 - Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
 - Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
 
Sunday, 25 August 1996
Monday, 26 August 1996
- Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
 - [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]
 
Sunday, 25 August 1996
Friday, 23 August 1996
Thursday, 22 August 1996
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-pep-02
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-pep-02
 - Re: Feature tag registration
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
 - Re: Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
 - Re: Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-pep-02
 
Wednesday, 21 August 1996
- Re: Feature tag registration
 - Re: HTTP/1.1, queries, and redirect
 - HTTP/1.1, queries, and redirect
 - Feature tag registration
 - Re: (revised) HTTP working group status
 
Tuesday, 20 August 1996
- Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: Hyphens and under bars
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Hyphens and under bars
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: Entity Tags
 - Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-pep-02
 - Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
 - Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
 - Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
 - I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-pep-00.txt
 - Re: (revised) HTTP working group status
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-pep-02
 - Re: Entity Tags
 - Re: (revised) HTTP working group status
 - Re: (revised) HTTP working group status
 - Re: Entity Tags
 - Re: (revised) HTTP working group status
 
Monday, 19 August 1996
- Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
 - Re: Entity Tags
 - Re: (revised) HTTP working group status
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-pep-02
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - draft-jepi-uppflow-00
 - draft-ietf-http-pep-02
 - Re: HTTP 1.1: Horse out of the barn
 - HTTP 1.1: Horse out of the barn
 - Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
 - (revised) HTTP working group status
 - Re: 201 created on PUT Method etc
 - Lynx as a HTTP/1.0 application (was Re: Call for compatibility testers)
 - Re: Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
 - Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
 - Re: Call for compatibility testers
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 
Sunday, 18 August 1996
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: 201 created on PUT Method etc
 - [johnh@isi.edu: document about P-HTTP/TCP interactions]
 - 201 created on PUT Method etc
 - When to send HTTP/1.1
 - Re: Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: Call for compatibility testers
 
Saturday, 17 August 1996
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: When to make objects uncacheable ?
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 
Friday, 16 August 1996
- RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - When to make objects uncacheable ?
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
 - I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07.txt, .ps
 - Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
 - Problems with draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07
 - Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
 - Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
 - Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
 - Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
 - RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
 - Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
 - Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
 
Thursday, 15 August 1996
- Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
 - Re: HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 
Saturday, 15 June 1996
Thursday, 15 August 1996
- HTTP 1.1 Server Available for Testing
 - POPUP WINDOW
 - I-D ACTION:draft-holtman-http-negotiation-02.txt
 - Re: Entity Tags
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 
Wednesday, 14 August 1996
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Am I a ghost?
 - Submission of draft-holtman-http-negotiation-02.txt
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Call for compatibility testers
 - drafts please
 - Re: Call for compatibility testers
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 
Tuesday, 13 August 1996
- Re: Entity Tags
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: HTTP State Management Mechanism draft question
 - Re: Entity Tags
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Entity Tags
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-07.txt
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 
Monday, 12 August 1996
- Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - web directory listing
 - HTTP State Management Mechanism draft question
 - RE: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: Next draft of HTTP/1.1 spec...
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Non-numeric feature tags
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - RE: Entity Tags
 - Entity Tags
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 
Sunday, 11 August 1996
Saturday, 10 August 1996
- Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Conventions for Sharing User Agent Profiles
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: Size of the Spec Was:Re: Beyond 1.1
 - Re: Meta data in anchors..
 - Re: these results sound very encouraging
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 
Friday, 9 August 1996
Saturday, 10 August 1996
Friday, 9 August 1996
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Call for compatibility testers
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - RE: Sticky stuff.
 - RE: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Size of the Spec Was:Re: Beyond 1.1
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Next draft of HTTP/1.1 spec...
 - RE: useful document identification (was encouraging....)
 - Re: Statistics on reusing request headers in persistent connections (repost)
 - Re: Call for compatibility testers
 - Re: Call for compatibility testers
 - Re: useful document identification (was encouraging....)
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - RE: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Call for compatibility testers
 - Re: Statistics on reusing request headers in persistent connections (repost)
 - Re: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 
Thursday, 8 August 1996
- Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Statistics on reusing request headers in persistent connections (repost)
 - RE: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Sticky stuff.
 - Sticky stuff.
 - Re: Size of the Spec Was:Re: Beyond 1.1
 - RE: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 - Re: Size of the Spec Was:Re: Beyond 1.1
 - Size of the Spec Was:Re: Beyond 1.1
 - RE: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 
Tuesday, 9 August 1994
Thursday, 8 August 1996
- Re: Beyond 1.1
 - Beyond 1.1
 - Call for compatibility testers
 - RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: Meta data in anchors..
 - Re: Questions about i18n support in HTTP
 - Re: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 
Wednesday, 7 August 1996
- Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-01
 - RE: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft --as an attachment)
 - RE: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 - RE: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 - RE: Sitcky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 - useful document identification (was encouraging....)
 - RE: Sitcky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 - Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-01
 - Re: Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 - Re: Sitcky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 - RE: hit-metering poll
 - Re: hit-metering poll
 - Meta data in anchors..
 - RE: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment
 - Questions about i18n support in HTTP
 - Re: Apache Cookie Log Analyzer (was: Re: hit-metering poll)
 - Apache Cookie Log Analyzer (was: Re: hit-metering poll)
 - Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-01
 - Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-01
 - Re: Last Call: Proposed HTTP State Management Mechanism to Proposed Standard
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - another content-negotiation script
 - Re: hit-metering poll
 
Tuesday, 6 August 1996
- Re: Last Call: Proposed HTTP State Management Mechanism to Proposed Standard
 - Re: hit-metering poll
 - RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - hit-metering poll
 - Last Call: Proposed HTTP State Management Mechanism to Proposed Standard
 - (no subject)
 - draft-mutz-http-attributes-01
 - Re: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: these results sound very encouraging
 - these results sound very encouraging
 
Monday, 5 August 1996
- RE: New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Sticky headers and multiplexing (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 - Sticky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 - Content negotiation implementations available
 - Sitcky headers and pipelining (was: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment)
 - Re: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment
 - Re: Sticky header draft -- as an attachment
 - Sticky header draft -- as an attachment
 
Sunday, 4 August 1996
Saturday, 3 August 1996
Friday, 2 August 1996
Thursday, 1 August 1996
- RE: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
 - Authentication issue
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
 - Server-side rendering engines
 - Re: HTTP/1.2 topics and beyond
 - New document on "HTTP/1.2 extension protocol" SOON
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
 
Wednesday, 31 July 1996
- New document on "Simple hit-metering for HTTP"
 - Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
 - draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt
 
Tuesday, 30 July 1996
Monday, 29 July 1996
Sunday, 28 July 1996
Wednesday, 24 July 1996
- Re: HTTP/1.2 topics and beyond
 - Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt, .ps
 - HTTP/1.1 draft 6, minor EDIT
 - Re: HTTP/1.2 topics and beyond
 - Re: Please publish draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt as an Internet Standard
 - Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt, .ps
 - Re: HTTP 1.1, rev 6 comments
 - RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt, .ps
 - Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt, .ps
 
Tuesday, 23 July 1996
- HTTP 1.1, rev 6 comments
 - draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-06
 - Re: Please publish draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt as an Internet Standard
 - Please publish draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt as an Internet Standard
 - http-state-mgmt-03.txt changes
 
Monday, 22 July 1996
- Re: Vary and Accept-Language
 - Re: Vary and Accept-Language
 - Vary and Accept-Language
 - I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-03.txt, .ps
 
Sunday, 21 July 1996
Saturday, 20 July 1996
Friday, 19 July 1996
- Re: The Title header
 - Re: The Title header
 - Re: The Title header
 - Re: The Title header
 - Re: The Title header
 - RE: The Title header
 - Re: The Title header
 
Wednesday, 17 July 1996
Tuesday, 16 July 1996
- RE: Is referer spelled wrong?
 - RE: Is referer spelled wrong?
 - RE: Is referer spelled wrong?
 - Re: Is referer spelled wrong?
 - Re: Any interest in automatic link-updating?
 - Re: Is referer spelled wrong?
 - Re: Is referer spelled wrong?
 - RE: Is referer spelled wrong?
 - RE: Is referer spelled wrong?
 - RE: Any interest in automatic link-updating?
 - Re: Language negotiation and robots
 - Re: Minor issues with HTTP 1.1 draft 6
 - Re: Any interest in automatic link-updating?
 
Monday, 15 July 1996
- Re: Any interest in automatic link-updating?
 - Minor issues with HTTP 1.1 draft 6
 - Re: Any interest in automatic link-updating?
 
Sunday, 14 July 1996
Saturday, 13 July 1996
- Re: Any interest in automatic link-updating?
 - Any interest in automatic link-updating?
 - Re: Remapping charsets
 - Re: Starting HTTP-NG
 - Re: HTTP/1.2 topics and beyond
 
Friday, 12 July 1996
- Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
 - Starting HTTP-NG
 - HTTP/1.2 topics and beyond
 - Re: Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: chopping list
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Re: short names for headers
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 
Thursday, 11 July 1996
- Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Confusion about Age: accuracy vs. safety
 - Re: Remapping charsets
 - chopping list
 - Re: Demographics
 - RE: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - RE: Demographics
 - Remapping charsets
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Re: Demographics
 - Re: short names for headers
 - Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
 - RE: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Re: short names for headers
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 
Wednesday, 10 July 1996
- RE: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - RE: Demographics
 - Re: Demographics
 - RE: Demographics
 - RE: short names for headers
 - short names for headers
 - RE: Demographics
 - Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
 - Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-06.txt, .ps
 - Re: Demographics
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Re: Demographics
 - Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
 - Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Re: Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Re: Demographics
 - Re: Demographics
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 
Tuesday, 9 July 1996
- RE: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Re: multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Demographics
 - multi-host virtual sites for HTTP 1.2
 - Draft 06 submitted to internet drafts directory.
 
Monday, 8 July 1996
- Last Call: A Proposed Extension to HTTP : Digest Access Authentication to Proposed Standard
 - charset bugs (was: proposed HTTP changes for charset)
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Unregistered charset values in HTTP 1.1, the ISO-8859-* values
 - "charset" issue is closed in HTTP-WG
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: If-Range Question
 
Sunday, 7 July 1996
- Re: If-Range Question
 - If-Range Question
 - Strange proxy behavior
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 
Saturday, 6 July 1996
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: Problem with authentication challenge BNF and Digest
 - Re: Problem with authentication challenge BNF and Digest
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 
Friday, 5 July 1996
- RE: Problem with authentication challenge BNF and Digest
 - Re: Problem with authentication challenge BNF and Digest
 - Problem with authentication challenge BNF and Digest
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - RE: Microsoft Information Server HTTP incompliance...
 
Thursday, 4 July 1996
- Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
 - Re: Microsoft Information Server HTTP incompliance...
 - Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
 - Re: re-revised last last words
 
Wednesday, 3 July 1996
- Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
 - Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
 - Re: Microsoft Information Server HTTP incompliance...
 - Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
 - Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
 - Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
 - Re: Microsoft Information Server HTTP incompliance...
 - Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
 - re-revised last last words
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Microsoft Information Server HTTP incompliance...
 - Re: Minor fixes to draft 05
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Minor fixes to draft 05
 - Re: MIME and Warning header syntax
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - RE: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - MIME and Warning header syntax
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Please publish draft-ietf-http-digest-aa-04.txt as an Internet Standard
 - minutes, HTTP Working Group, IETF June 96, Montreal
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - Re: proposed HTTP changes for charset
 - proposed HTTP changes for charset