- From: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 96 10:40:23 PST
- To: http-wg-request%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Any digest that included the URI would be wrong if the URI is munged by the proxy. It would break Digest Authentication, for example. ---------- ] From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com> ] To: <"http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com">; ] <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com> ] Subject: proxies rewriting URLs ] Date: Wednesday, March 06, 1996 11:52PM ] ] Apologies if this is clear in the text, but it didn't seem to be when ] I scanned 1.1. Some older proxies seemed to be modifying URLs, e.g., ] ] if you ] ] GET http://foo.com/test#frob HTTP/1.0 ] ] they might ask foo.com for ] ] GET /test%23frob HTTP/1.0 ] ] or vice versa. Is there any reason to disallow this, and if so, what ] language would be put in the spec to disallow it; alternatively, if ] proxies might do this kind of transformation, what should we say? ] ] ] ] ] ] ]
Received on Friday, 8 March 1996 10:41:36 UTC