- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 03:09:11 -0800
- To: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Koen writes: > Two new cache-control request directives, "may-cache" and "min-age" > that indicate possible weakening of any "no-cache" and "max-age" > restrictions, would work for me. ... I think that the proposed "max-stale" directive does indicate what Koen would like the client to indicate. "may-cache" would therefore be redundant. I have no idea what "min-age" would be used for, since the client certainly wouldn't reject a fresh response. In other words, I think we reached an acceptable compromise before this thread started. ......Roy
Received on Thursday, 29 February 1996 03:12:13 UTC