Gavin Nicol writes: > >The bottom line is that in current practice there is no default, and > >IMHO recommended practice should be the same: no default, charset > >compulsory. > > Quite. It's a pity we have to standardise behaviour that is > incorrect. Well, as I see current practise, all the relevant servers and clients that I see in our environment handles iso-8859-1 as the default. And I live in a very 8859-1 dependent environment. So as this is even the specified behaviour from olden times, and current practise, I ask you to keep that in the spec, possibly with some words that some very few servers/agents do not support it. There was some wording mailed earlier that has such wording. keldReceived on Monday, 12 February 1996 15:21:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:57 UTC