Ned said: > There are plenty of ways to approach this that do not require putting a hard > upper limit on URL size. For example, you could say that "all implementations > are required to support URLs at least 255 characters long and implementations > are encouraged to support URLs of as long a length as is feasible". Yep, that's good wording too. ......RoyReceived on Friday, 9 February 1996 02:30:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:57 UTC