W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1996

Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation

From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 96 10:30:01 JST
Message-Id: <199602010130.KAA14349@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@stonehand.com>
Cc: keld@dkuug.dk, masinter@parc.xerox.com, yergeau@alis.ca, Dan.Oscarsson@malmo.trab.se, html-wg@fssun09.dev.oclc.org, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, maits@dkuug.dk, uri@bunyip.com

>   ... for example big-5 is not covered by ISO 10646 ...
> 
> Why do you say this?

In Big-5, two characters are duplicatedly encoded to have two code
points. So, mapping from CNS 11643 or ISO 10646 can not be one to
one.

That is, % notation is the way to go.

							Masataka Ohta

Received on Wednesday, 31 January 1996 17:45:23 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David W. Morris: "Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302"
Previous message: Dave Long: "Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302"
In reply to: Glenn Adams: "Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation"
Next in thread: Keld J|rn Simonsen: "Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:57 UTC