- From: Keld J|rn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 20:07:11 +0100
- To: Dan.Oscarsson@malmo.trab.se, html-wg@oclc.org, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: maits@dkuug.dk
Dan.Oscarsson@malmo.trab.se writes about URLs in more than ASCII. I would propose that URLs be written in the charset of the document that references the url, possibly enhanced with the extensions that we make to get further characters, for example &a-ring; or &#xxxx; This is the most natural way - users are then only restricted to the charset that they use anyway, and normal HTML rules can just prevail. If a server will understand this code it has to have the capabilities to understand the extended URL notation anyway, eg. by adequate charset conversion software. I think that just using some kind of UCS would make it hard when we have an environment where the html is in 8859-1 - that would be mixing apples and oranges and thus very hard to maintain. Keld
Received on Sunday, 28 January 1996 11:11:23 UTC