- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 13:16:31 PST
- To: pjc@trusted.com
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> Section 8.4 POST (and others) > This section discusses a two phase process for the processing of POST requests. > Part of the process is a five second pause. > Use of this type of mechanism cannot work in general! It is not possible > to design a reliable mechanism where the lask of a response in a timeframe > such as this is part of the protocol. There was extensive discussion of this issue under the subject lines: > two-phase send concerns > 'PUT' transaction reconsidered (was Re: two-phase send concerns) > A Hybred PUT Scheme (was Re: 'PUT' ...) > safe PUT with contributors: dmk@allegra.att.com (Dave Kristol) "David W. Morris" <dwm@shell.portal.com> "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@avron.ics.uci.edu> koen@win.tue.nl (Koen Holtman) Roger Gonzalez <rg@caffeine.server.net> Arjun Ray <aray@pipeline.com> Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com> Rohit Khare <khare@pest.w3.org> Dave Long <dave@navisoft.com> Fisher Mark <FisherM@is3.indy.tce.com> It would be useful for some subset of you to get together and create either a recommended set of edits for the HTTP/1.1 proposal and/or a separate document.
Received on Sunday, 21 January 1996 13:18:21 UTC