W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1996

Re: Where should Digest go next?

From: Mary Ellen Zurko <zurko@osf.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 1996 16:31:14 -0500
Message-Id: <199601052131.QAA19767@postman.osf.org>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, zurko@osf.org

Is anyone really considering the alternative of:

> 5- Don't handle as part of IETF

in the context of W3C? I have no idea what the process is to get W3C's
blessing of a standard, but if there are problems with 4, pursuing a W3C
standard seems like a good way to go.
	Mez

Received on Friday, 5 January 1996 13:37:08 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Koen Holtman: "Re: safe PUT"
Previous message: Larry Masinter: "FTP-able archive of HTTP-WG mail?"
In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Re: Where should Digest go next?"
Next in thread: Robert B. Denny: "Re: Where should Digest go next?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:57 UTC