Sunday, 31 March 1996
Saturday, 30 March 1996
Friday, 29 March 1996
- (HOST) (FULLURL) draft of changes for W.G. review.
- (DNS) consensus wording
- (MEDIATYPES) consensus.
- (CODES) Draft additions/changes to section 9.4 for 4xx class status codes.
Thursday, 28 March 1996
- Re: gethostbyname (was Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review. )
- Re: gethostbyname (was Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review. )
- Re: Apache LogFormat - addition of %v virtual server ID
- Re: gethostbyname (was Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review. )
- Re: gethostbyname (was Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review. )
- Apache LogFormat - addition of %v virtual server ID
- Re: gethostbyname (was Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review. )
- Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review.
Wednesday, 27 March 1996
- Re: gethostbyname (was Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review. )
- Re: gethostbyname (was Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review. )
- Re: gethostbyname (was Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review. )
- Re: gethostbyname (was Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review. )
- RE: gethostbyname (was Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review. )
- gethostbyname (was Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review. )
- Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review.
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review.
- Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review.
- Re: (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review.
- Re: Persistent Connection Question
- Re: Persistent Connection Question
- Persistent Connection Question
- Re: the Host: saga
Tuesday, 26 March 1996
- (PRIVACY) Draft words for W.G. review.
- (SECFILE) Consensus
- Resend: URI http: specification
- (CONTENT) draft wording for W.G. review
- Re: About that Host: header....
- (DNS) draft wording for W.G. review.
- (RFC 1900) Consensus
- Host: header and port number
- Re: About that Host: header....
- the Host: saga
- What is the purpose of Keep alive?
Monday, 25 March 1996
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-digest-aa-03.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-digest-aa-03.txt
- Administrivia: digest of list available
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Proposed revision to security considerations
Sunday, 24 March 1996
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: Some randomness concerning chunked encoding.
- Issue: interoperability between HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1 (was: Via Header Field)
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Via Header Field (replaces Forwarded)
Saturday, 23 March 1996
Friday, 22 March 1996
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: Issues Beyond HTTP/1.1 ???
- Issues Beyond HTTP/1.1 ???
- Process for closing out issues. (Please Read This Message).
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
Thursday, 21 March 1996
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
Wednesday, 20 March 1996
Tuesday, 19 March 1996
Wednesday, 20 March 1996
- Issues list...
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
Tuesday, 19 March 1996
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- HTTP protocol and COBOL programs
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
- Re: About that Host: header....
Monday, 18 March 1996
- I need more information
- Additional comments on the Host: header....
- Content negotiation status
- Re: New section for Host
- Proposed structure of HTTP 1.1 document(s).
- Re: About that Host: header....
Sunday, 17 March 1996
Saturday, 16 March 1996
- draft-ietf-http-logfile-00.txt and multiple directives
- Re: HTTP version number
- Re: HTTP version number
- Re: HTTP version number
- New section for Host
- unnecessary chatter on closed issues (multipart vs chunked)
- RE: ISSUES LIST: Chunked Encoding
Friday, 15 March 1996
- Re: ISSUES LIST: Chunked Encoding
- Re: ISSUES LIST: Chunked Encoding
- Re: ISSUES LIST: Chunked Encoding
- Re: ISSUES LIST: Chunked Encoding
- Re: ISSUES LIST: Chunked Encoding
- ISSUES LIST: Chunked Encoding
- Re: entity header field
- Re: entity header field
- entity header field
- RE: proxies rewriting URLs
- revised HTTP working group charter
- Minutes, HTTP working group, 35th IETF
Wednesday, 13 March 1996
- Re: HTTP version number
- Re: PUT, DELETE vs. POST
- Re: hallam@w3.org: Netscape Bug or KeepAlive Feature ?
- Dates for HTTP 1.1
- Re: proxies rewriting URLs
- Re: hallam@w3.org: Netscape Bug or KeepAlive Feature ?
- Re: proxies rewriting URLs
- Re: proxies rewriting URLs
Tuesday, 12 March 1996
- subscribe
- Re: Variant IDsg
- As you probably know by now... (schedule and important points)
- Re: Variant IDs
- Re: Variant IDs
- Re: Cache validators
- Re: Cache validators
- Re: proxies rewriting URLs
Monday, 11 March 1996
Tuesday, 12 March 1996
Monday, 11 March 1996
- Re: proxies rewriting URLs
- Re: Variant IDs
- FW: "Value" caches (was Can proxies rewrite Date:?)
- Re: Variant IDs
- RE: proxies rewriting URLs
- Re: proxies rewriting URLs
- Re: proxies rewriting URLs
- Re: proxies rewriting URLs
- UCI archives will be down sometime Tuesday
- Re: Variant IDs
- Re: HTTP version number
- Re: Cache validators
- Re: Footers and Chunked
- Re: proxies rewriting URLs
- RE: proxies rewriting URLs
Sunday, 10 March 1996
Saturday, 9 March 1996
- Re: Can proxies rewrite Date:?
- Re: Footers and Chunked
- Re: Footers and Chunked
- [hallam@w3.org: Footers and Chunked ]
- HTTP meeting summary
- FW: "Value" caches (was Can proxies rewrite Date:?)
Friday, 8 March 1996
- Re: Can proxies rewrite Date:?
- Re: HTTP version number
- Re: Can proxies rewrite Date:?
- RE: proxies rewriting URLs
- Re: Can proxies rewrite Date:?
- Re: Allowing servers to contact proxies
Thursday, 7 March 1996
- Confirm!
- Re: Can proxies rewrite Date:?
- Allowing servers to contact proxies
- proxies rewriting URLs
- PUT, DELETE vs. POST
- Re: hallam@w3.org: Netscape Bug or KeepAlive Feature ?
Tuesday, 5 March 1996
Wednesday, 6 March 1996
Tuesday, 5 March 1996
- Re: Compression of HTML documents over HTTP
- Re: hallam@w3.org: Netscape Bug or KeepAlive Feature ?
- Compression of HTML documents over HTTP
- Re: Can proxies rewrite Date:?
- TRACE: HTTP/1.1 open issue
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Re: hallam@w3.org: Netscape Bug or KeepAlive Feature ?
- Can proxies rewrite Date:?
- Re: Cache validators
- Feature Negotiation Headers and Calculations, v1
Monday, 4 March 1996
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: hallam@w3.org: Netscape Bug or KeepAlive Feature ?
- Re: hallam@w3.org: Netscape Bug or KeepAlive Feature ?
- URI http: specification
- Re: hallam@w3.org: Netscape Bug or KeepAlive Feature ?
- Re: hallam@w3.org: Netscape Bug or KeepAlive Feature ?
- Re: hallam@w3.org: Netscape Bug or KeepAlive Feature ?
- Re: hallam@w3.org: Netscape Bug or KeepAlive Feature ?
- Re: HTTP version number
- Re: If-ID and Unless-ID Preconditions
- hallam@w3.org: Netscape Bug or KeepAlive Feature ?
Sunday, 3 March 1996
- Re: If-ID and Unless-ID Preconditions
- Re: HTTP version number
- Re: Some randomness concerning chunked encoding.
- RE: Variant IDs
Saturday, 2 March 1996
- Some randomness concerning chunked encoding.
- Re: Non Latin1 charsets (draft-holtman-http-negotiation-00.txt)
- Re: Non Latin1 charsets (draft-holtman-http-negotiation-00.txt)
- Variant IDs
- Re: Digest-MessageDigest doesn't work with proxies
Friday, 1 March 1996
- HTTP version number
- Re: Digest-MessageDigest doesn't work with proxies
- Digest-MessageDigest doesn't work with proxies
- Re: Digest-MessageDigest doesn't work with proxies
- Re: Proxies and Digest-MessageDigest
- Digest-MessageDigest doesn't work with proxies
- Re: Non Latin1 charsets (draft-holtman-http-negotiation-00.txt)
- Re: Non Latin1 charsets (draft-holtman-http-negotiation-00.txt)
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Re: Non Latin1 charsets (draft-holtman-http-negotiation-00.txt)
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: Non Latin1 charsets (draft-holtman-http-negotiation-00.txt)
- Re: Non Latin1 charsets (draft-holtman-http-negotiation-00.txt)
- Non Latin1 charsets (draft-holtman-http-negotiation-00.txt)
- Re: Proxies and Digest-MessageDigest
Thursday, 29 February 1996
- Re: Proxies and Digest-MessageDigest
- Re: Proxies and Digest-MessageDigest
- Proxies and Digest-MessageDigest
- Re: more minor Digest Auth editorial comments
- Re: Question re. OPTIONS, ALLOW
- Proxies and Digest Auth
- Re: more minor Digest Auth editorial comments
- Re: Digesting headers
- Re: Digesting the digest...
- Digesting headers
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- If-ID and Unless-ID Preconditions
- Re: Question re. OPTIONS, ALLOW
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: more minor Digest Auth editorial comments
- Re: more minor Digest Auth editorial comments
- Re: Digesting the digest...
- Re: Digesting the digest...
- Re: Digesting the digest...
- Re: more minor Digest Auth editorial comments
- Re: more minor Digest Auth editorial comments
Wednesday, 28 February 1996
- Re: Digesting the digest...
- Re: Digesting the digest...
- Re: Digesting the digest...
- Digesting the digest...
- Re: more minor Digest Auth editorial comments
- Re: Digest Auth: mutual? (was Digest Auth (I think we have a deal!))
- Re: more minor Digest Auth editorial comments
- Re: Negotiation issue list
- Re: transparency, SHOULD and MUST
- Re: Digest Auth: mutual? (was Digest Auth (I think we have a deal!))
- Re: more minor Digest Auth editorial comments
- Re: Negotiation issue list
- Re: feature negotiation
- RE: Digest Auth (I think we have a deal!)
- issue status, last update for a while
- transparency, SHOULD and MUST
- more minor Digest Auth editorial comments
Tuesday, 27 February 1996
- Re: Negotiation issue list
- Digest Auth: mutual? (was Digest Auth (I think we have a deal!))
- Digest Auth editorial comments
- Negotiation issue list
- Re: Digest Auth (I think we have a deal!)
- Re: Where we stand on Digest Authentication
- RE: Digest Auth (I think we have a deal!)
- Re: Digest Auth defending against replay
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Digest Auth (I think we have a deal!)
- FW: Digest Auth defending against replay
- RE: Where we stand on Digest Authentication
- Re: Where we stand on Digest Authentication
- Re: Where we stand on Digest Authentication
- Where we stand on Digest Authentication
- PEP Draft 2 available
- Re: HTTP-WG meeting: Need volunteers
- HTTP-WG meeting: Need volunteers
- RE: Digest Auth defending against replay
- Draft agenda, HTTP-WG
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Re: Digest Auth defending against replay
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- RE: Digest Auth defending against replay
Monday, 26 February 1996
- RE: Digest Auth defending against replay
- Re: Digest Auth defending against replay
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Re: feature negotiation
- Re: Digest Auth defending against replay
- Re: Cache validators
- HTTP-WG Mailing List Archive for Q1, 1996: Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- RE: Digest Auth defending against replay
- RE: New draft for Digest Authentication
- Re: Digest Auth defending against replay
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- draft-kristol-http-state-mgmt-00.txt, .ps
Sunday, 25 February 1996
Monday, 26 February 1996
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Re: Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
Sunday, 25 February 1996
Monday, 26 February 1996
- Re: feature negotiation
- Re: feature negotiation
- Re: feature negotiation
- Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- feature negotiation
- Transparency vs. Performance: survey of opinion
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-ses-ext-01.txt
Sunday, 25 February 1996
- New content negotiation sections, v4 (long)
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: Cache validators
- what's with the renaming
- more draft renames
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- HTTP/1.0 submitted for Informational RFC
Saturday, 24 February 1996
- state management status
- please rename draft-ietf-http-logfile-00.txt to draft-hallam-http-logfile-00.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-proxy-note-00.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-session-id-00.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-logfile-00.txt
- subscribe
- Re: Cache validators
- Digest Auth defending against replay
- WRAPPED (was Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade? )
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
Friday, 23 February 1996
Saturday, 24 February 1996
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: remove WRAPPED?
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- RE: New draft for Digest Authentication
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
Friday, 23 February 1996
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- RE: New draft for Digest Authentication
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- Re: Agenda for Transport/Apps BOF
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- RE: New draft for Digest Authentication
- RE: New draft for Digest Authentication
- Agenda for Transport/Apps BOF
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- Re: URI Pattern Syntax
- Re: archives temporarily moved
- Re: hallam@w3.org: Re: Notification for Proxy Caches
- URI Pattern Syntax
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- hallam@w3.org: Re: Notification for Proxy Caches
- Charles Neerdaels: Notification for Proxy Caches
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: Three working drafts related to demographics work.
- New draft for Digest Authentication
- Re: Three working drafts related to demographics work.
- Re: remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- remove PATCH, COPY, MOVE, DELETE, etc.? Upgrade?
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Digest Authentication editor found
- Re: CGI in HTTP standards documents
- Re: CGI in HTTP standards documents
- Re: CGI in HTTP standards documents
- CGI in HTTP standards documents
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-ses-ext-01.txt
- Digest Authentication topic closed
Thursday, 22 February 1996
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-ses-ext-01.txt
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-ses-ext-01.txt
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-ses-ext-01.txt
- Re: more on Digest Autho
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: more on Digest Autho
- (no subject)
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Status of Digest Authentication
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-ses-ext-01.txt
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- archives temporarily moved
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: Cache validators
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: more on Digest Auth
Wednesday, 21 February 1996
Thursday, 22 February 1996
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- FW: more on Digest Auth
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: agenda for LA HTTP meeting
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: agenda for LA HTTP meeting
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Three working drafts related to demographics work.
- agenda for LA HTTP meeting
Wednesday, 21 February 1996
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- Re: more on Digest Auth
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- more on Digest Auth
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- Re: APOP - authentication..
Tuesday, 20 February 1996
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- comments on draft-ietf-http-digest-aa-02.txt
- Re: Auth / APOP / RFC1734 / RFC1731
- Auth / APOP / RFC1734 / RFC1731
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- Re: RFC1734
- Re: RFC1734
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- Re: Other transfer codings
- Minimal compliance...
- Re: Other transfer codings
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- Re: Other transfer codings
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- Re: Other transfer codings
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- Re: APOP - authentication..
- Re: Other transfer codings
- Alex Hopmann: Re: New response code
- Re: Authentication - with authentication points.
- Alex Hopmann: Re: New response code
- Re: HTTP/1.0 Draft 05 now available
- Re: HTTP/1.0 Draft 05 now available
Monday, 19 February 1996
- HTTP/1.0 Draft 05 now available
- Re: why no-cache is not reload
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- APOP - authentication..
- Other transfer codings
- Re: New response code
- Re: New response code
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- Re: New response code
- Re: New response code
- Re: New response code
Sunday, 18 February 1996
- Re: why no-cache is not reload
- Re: Number of connections (was: Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list)
- Re: why no-cache is not reload
Saturday, 17 February 1996
- Re: why no-cache is not reload
- Re: Round 4: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Round 4: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Round 4: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: why no-cache is not reload
Friday, 16 February 1996
- Re: FW: Number of connections
- Re: FW: Number of connections
- Re: why no-cache is not reload
- Re: FW: Number of connections
- Round 4: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: FW: Number of connections
- Re: Issue List: CACHEDATE
- Re: FW: Number of connections
- Re: FW: Number of connections
- why no-cache is not reload
Thursday, 15 February 1996
- Re: Data Integrity
- FW: Number of connections
- Re: Data Integrity
- Re: Data Integrity
- Re: Data Integrity
- Data Integrity
- Data Integrity
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- Re: Issue List: CACHEDATE
- Re: Issue List: CACHEDATE
- Re: Number of connections (was: Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list)
- Re: Issue List: CACHEDATE
- Is it just me..
- Re: Issue List: CACHEDATE
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- Re: Number of connections (was: Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list)
- Re: Number of connections (was: Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list)
Wednesday, 14 February 1996
- Number of connections (was: Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list)
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- Re: HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
- Accept headers and privacy
- Re: Issue List: CACHEDATE
- Re: Issue List: CACHEDATE
- Re: Issue List: CACHEDATE
- Re: Issue List: CACHEDATE
- Re: Issue List: CACHEDATE
- Issue List: CACHEDATE
- HTTP Working Group 'issues' list
Tuesday, 13 February 1996
- issue status, etc.
- Re: HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
- Re: HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
Monday, 12 February 1996
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
Sunday, 11 February 1996
Monday, 12 February 1996
- Re: HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
- Re: HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
Sunday, 11 February 1996
- Re: HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
- Re: HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
- Re: HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
Saturday, 10 February 1996
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
Friday, 9 February 1996
- Re: HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
Thursday, 8 February 1996
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: HTTP 1.0 & 1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
- HTTP 1.0&1.1 URL safe characters conflict with HTML?
- (no subject)
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Authentication - with authentication points.
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
Wednesday, 7 February 1996
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Signatures and Authentication information must go at end of meesage.
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
Tuesday, 6 February 1996
Monday, 5 February 1996
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: Length - any takers?
- Re: Length - any takers?
- Re: Length - any takers?
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
Sunday, 4 February 1996
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- Re: don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
- don't use POST for big GET [was: Dictionaries in HTML ]
Saturday, 3 February 1996
Friday, 2 February 1996
- Re: Length - any takers?
- Re: Length - any takers?
- Re: Length - any takers?
- Re: Length - any takers?
- Re: Length - any takers?
- Re: Length - any takers?
Thursday, 1 February 1996
- Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302
- Length - any takers?
- NOW TO SUBSCRIBE AND UNSUBSCRIBE
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302
- Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302
- Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302
- Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302
- Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302
- Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
Wednesday, 31 January 1996
- Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302
- Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Authentication - with authentication points.
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: 5th WWW Conference -Paris : REGISTRATION IS NOW OPEN
- help
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
Tuesday, 30 January 1996
- Re: Describing current practice for 301 and 302
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Describing current practice for 301 and 302
Monday, 29 January 1996
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
Sunday, 28 January 1996
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: (MAITS.496) html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- Re: html, http, urls and internationalisation
- html, http, urls and internationalisation
Saturday, 27 January 1996
Friday, 26 January 1996
- Re: 'Basic' Authentication...
- Re: PostScript version of http-v11-spec-01?
- Re: Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Round 3: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: 'Basic' Authentication...
Thursday, 25 January 1996
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Charsets revisited
- (no subject)
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Charsets revisited
- status of content-negotiation group
Wednesday, 24 January 1996
Thursday, 25 January 1996
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
Wednesday, 24 January 1996
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- PostScript version of http-v11-spec-01?
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Host: header and port number
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Host: header and port number
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Digest Authentication [Was: Re: 'Basic' Authentication...]
- Proposal on removing Content Negotiation from http 1.1
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Re: Charsets revisited
- Authentication in HTTP 1.1
- 5th WWW Conference -Paris : REGISTRATION IS NOW OPEN
- Re: Host: header and port number
- Re: Host: header and port number
- Re: Host: header and port number
- Re: Host: header and port number
- Re: Charsets revisited
Tuesday, 23 January 1996
- Status report for Caching subgroup
- Charsets revisited
- Re: Host: header and port number
- Re: Host: header and port number
- Re: elaboration on MIME and HTTP issue
- Re: Host: header and port number
- Re: Host: header and port number
- Host: header and port number
- Re: elaboration on MIME and HTTP issue
Monday, 22 January 1996
Sunday, 21 January 1996
- Re: Where should Digest go next.
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-v11-spec-00
- comments on proxy-authenticate.
- Comments on draft-ietf-v11-spec-00
- Re: state management sub-group status
Saturday, 20 January 1996
Friday, 19 January 1996
Saturday, 20 January 1996
Friday, 19 January 1996
- Persistent-connections subgroup status
- draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-01.txt?
- Re: [S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk: HTTP/1.1 Host request-header query]
- RE: elaboration on MIME and HTTP issue
- Quasi-report from the extensions subgroup
- Re: elaboration on MIME and HTTP issue
- Re: elaboration on MIME and HTTP issue
- [S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk: HTTP/1.1 Host request-header query]
- Re: Request for meeting at IETF in LA
- subgroup status: please report
- elaboration on MIME and HTTP issue
Thursday, 18 January 1996
- Re: Request for meeting at IETF in LA
- Re: Byte ranges & Document title (question)
- Request for meeting at IETF in LA
- Re: Byte ranges & Document title (question)
- Re: Byte ranges & Document title (question)
- Byte ranges & Document title (question)
- Re: Byte ranges & Document title (question)
- MIME and HTTP
Wednesday, 17 January 1996
Tuesday, 16 January 1996
Friday, 12 January 1996
Thursday, 11 January 1996
- Re: Round 2: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Round 2: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Los Angeles scheduling..
- Re: Los Angeles scheduling..
- Re: Los Angeles scheduling.. (HTTP)
- Re: Los Angeles scheduling..
- Los Angeles scheduling..
Wednesday, 10 January 1996
Tuesday, 9 January 1996
- Re: Administrivia: bounced messages
- Re: Round 2: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Round 2: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Round 2: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
- Re: Round 2: moving HTTP 1.0 to informational
Monday, 8 January 1996
Sunday, 7 January 1996
Saturday, 6 January 1996
Friday, 5 January 1996
Thursday, 4 January 1996
- Re: Where should Digest go next?
- RE: safe PUT
- Re: Where should Digest go next?
- Re: Where should Digest go next?
- Re: Where should Digest go next?
- Re: Caching data returned from POST, and conditional POST
- Re: Where should Digest go next?
- Re: Where should Digest go next?
- Re: Where should Digest go next?
- Re: Caching data returned from POST, and conditional POST
- Re: Caching data returned from POST, and conditional POST
Wednesday, 3 January 1996
- Re: Where should Digest go next?
- Re: Where should Digest go next?
- Where should Digest go next?
- Re: safe PUT
Tuesday, 2 January 1996
- Re: Caching data returned from POST, and conditional POST
- Re: Digest Authentication
- Re: Digest Authentication
- Re: Digest Authentication
- Re: Digest Authentication
- Re: Digest Authentication
Monday, 1 January 1996
- Re: Digest Authentication
- Re: Caching data returned from POST, and conditional POST
- Re: Caching data returned from POST, and conditional POST
- Re: Digest Authentication
- Re: Digest Authentication
- Re: Caching data returned from POST, and conditional POST
- Re: Caching data returned from POST, and conditional POST
- Re: Digest Authentication
- Re: Caching data returned from POST, and conditional POST
- Re: Digest Authentication