Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal

At 3:24 PM 5/18/95, Chuck Shotton wrote:
>Says who? Who said anything about proxies trying to be cute in the middle
>of byte range requests? The proxy should pass the request and the resulting
>data through unadulterated to the client and it SHOULDN'T cache it. Ever.
>These byte range requests should be treated like CGI requests, which should
>have the results of the request cached.

Gack! That should read "which SHOULDN'T have the results of the request cached."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chuck Shotton
cshotton@biap.com                                  http://www.biap.com/
cshotton@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu                           "I am NOT here."

Received on Thursday, 18 May 1995 13:50:42 UTC