Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal

At 3:24 PM 5/18/95, Chuck Shotton wrote:
>Says who? Who said anything about proxies trying to be cute in the middle
>of byte range requests? The proxy should pass the request and the resulting
>data through unadulterated to the client and it SHOULDN'T cache it. Ever.
>These byte range requests should be treated like CGI requests, which should
>have the results of the request cached.

Gack! That should read "which SHOULDN'T have the results of the request cached."

Chuck Shotton                                                   "I am NOT here."

Received on Thursday, 18 May 1995 13:50:42 UTC