The draft specifies that a 406 response must include the content-type, content-encoding, and content-language of the resounce. What is the correct response when there are multiple variants of a document, none of which match? As an example, suppose I have HTML versions of a resource in English, French, and Russian. Then I also have PDF versions in English, Spanish, and Russian. Lastly, I have a plaintext version in English which is only available with gzip encoding. The client asks a Russian plaintext version be sent with a unity encoding. (Assume here that the server doesn't do translations and conversions on the fly.) All of the versions have zero quality, since either the content-type or content-encoding doesn't match the request. But I can't really describe the varieties of the resource that are available, since the semantics for content-type and content-encoding don't provide for multiple tokens, and the semantics for content-language are such that multiple tokens don't really carry the correct meaning. Also, not all permutations of the existing types, encodings, and languages are available. Am I missing something obvious? -- Jim Seidman, Senior Software Engineer Spyglass Inc., 1230 E. Diehl Road, Naperville IL 60563Received on Thursday, 18 May 1995 09:44:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:55 UTC