W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 1995

Re: Worries about content-length

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Tue, 9 May 95 14:43:43 -0400
Message-Id: <9505091843.AA13200@sulphur.osf.org>
To: dwm@shell.portal.com, James@osf.org, Gosling <jag@scndprsn.eng.sun.com>
Cc: NED@sigurd.innosoft.com, masinter@parc.xerox.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com

>  It is not an
> unreasonable burden on HTTP servers to require accurate content-length

It requires that all documents returned by the server by pre-scanned.
There are apparently often times it is unreasonable.

Which do you prefer?
	foo | bar
	foo >tmp ; bar <tmp

Received on Tuesday, 9 May 1995 11:49:43 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David - Morris: "Re: Worries about content-length"
Previous message: Larry Masinter: "Re: Worries about content-length"
Maybe in reply to: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no: "Worries about content-length"
Next in thread: David - Morris: "Re: Worries about content-length"
Reply: David - Morris: "Re: Worries about content-length"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:55 UTC