> Dave Kristol wrote: > But you might want a separate Opaque: value for each of Session-ID > and WWW-Authenticate:. Better to leave them as attributes of a > particular header, IMO. It's certainly true that one could have an 'opaque' field defined, usefully, for almost any kind of header (different languages, for example, or different dates, or modified by dates, or dependent on URI, and so on). But it's over-heavy to define these as sub-fields of every kind of header, rather than sub-classes of opaque data (if the latter really are needed). Mike CowlishawReceived on Thursday, 27 April 1995 07:34:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:42:55 UTC