- From: Eric W. Sink <eric@spyglass.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 17:06:20 -0600
- To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Just a few minor ones:
Section 4.3.4: Mentioning that HTTP is not a MIME-conformant protocol,
without mentioning why, or at least a pointer to where in the spec this is
explained, leaves the reader a little cold.
Section 5.2.1: The material on If-Modified-Since seems out of place.
Perhaps move it to the section on that header (5.4.7).
Section 5.2.3: Mentioning HTML forms here should provide either a
definition of a FORM or a reference to the HTML spec.
Section 5.4.1: Mentioning in-line images should have a reference to the
HTML spec.
Section 5.4.2: The 'Note:' at the bottom has an extra period at the end.
Section 6.1: The comment about "HTTP/1.0" being sufficient to
differentiate Full-Response and Simple-Response seems either superfluous or
wrong. Why not make sure there is a 3 digit integer following it too?
(nit)
Section 6.2.2: I'm agreement with the momentum in the group meeting that
spec-ing this should be as bland as possible, not requiring a subset of
HTML.
--
Eric W. Sink, Senior Software Engineer -- eric@spyglass.com
http://www.spyglass.com/~eric/home.htm
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 1995 15:10:13 UTC