ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 1995 by date

Monday, 26 June 1995

• I-D ACTION: draft-luotonen-http-url-byterange-00.txt Ari Luotonen

Monday, 19 June 1995

• Re: Redirection inherits METHOD? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Redirection inherits METHOD? David Morris

Sunday, 18 June 1995

• Re: Redirection inherits METHOD? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Redirection inherits METHOD? wmperry@spry.com

Saturday, 17 June 1995

• Re: URI fields in response headers Shel Kaphan

Friday, 16 June 1995

• Re: Worries about content-length Rick Troth

Thursday, 15 June 1995

• Re: URI fields in response headers Jim Seidman
• http-ng mailing list now better Simon Spero
• New mailing list for http-ng Simon Spero
• Re: URI fields in response headers Roy T. Fielding
• Re: URI fields in response headers Jim Seidman
• URI fields in response headers Shel Kaphan

Wednesday, 14 June 1995

• URI fields in response headers Jim Seidman

Friday, 9 June 1995

• draft-kristol-http-extensions-00.{ps,txt} Dave Kristol
• Re: March 8 Internet Draft of HTTP/1.0 Mary Ellen Zurko

Wednesday, 7 June 1995

• Some questions on the draft HTTP document Bill Janssen

Tuesday, 6 June 1995

• March 8 Internet Draft of HTTP/1.0 Roger Gonzalez

Saturday, 3 June 1995

• WWW Servers Comparison Chart, version 2.2 WWW server FAQ

Friday, 2 June 1995

• Re: HTTP security risks Larry Masinter

Thursday, 1 June 1995

• HTTP security risks Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
• Re: Indexing extension (fwd) Ted Hardie
• Re: Indexing extension Ted Hardie
• Re: Indexing extension Martijn Koster

Wednesday, 31 May 1995

• Re: Indexing extension Ted Hardie
• Re: Indexing extension Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
• Q on HTTP/1.0 Sec. 11.2 Idempotent Methods Keenan Ross

Monday, 29 May 1995

• Request for help Slawek Zgliniecki

Sunday, 28 May 1995

• Re: Indexing extension Nick Arnett

Friday, 26 May 1995

• Indexing extension Ted Hardie
• Comments on draft-ietf-http-v10-spec-00.txt Rich Salz

Tuesday, 23 May 1995

• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Steven J. Richardson

Monday, 22 May 1995

• Re: What can you cache? [was: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal ] Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no

Friday, 19 May 1995

• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal David - Morris
• Re: What can you cache? [was: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal ] Larry Masinter
• Re: What can you cache? [was: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal ] David - Morris
• Re: What can you cache? [was: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal ] David - Morris
• FYI: Summary #1 of byte ranges Ari Luotonen
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Linus Upson
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Gavin Nicol
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Larry Masinter

Thursday, 18 May 1995

• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Brian Behlendorf
• Re: What can you cache? [was: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal ] Ari Luotonen
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Marc VanHeyningen
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Chuck Shotton
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Ari Luotonen
• Re: What can you cache? [was: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal ] Ari Luotonen
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Ari Luotonen
• Re: What can you cache? [was: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal ] Daniel W. Connolly
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Ari Luotonen
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Daniel W. Connolly
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Brian Behlendorf
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Chuck Shotton
• What can you cache? [was: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal ] Daniel W. Connolly
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Chuck Shotton
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Chuck Shotton
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Chuck Shotton
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Jim Seidman
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Brian Behlendorf
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal David - Morris
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal lazear@dockside.mitre.org
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Gavin Nicol
• Question about "406 None Acceptable" Jim Seidman
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Chuck Shotton
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal John Franks
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Jon Knight
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Gavin Nicol
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal John Franks
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Gavin Nicol
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Larry Masinter
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal John Franks

Wednesday, 17 May 1995

• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Chuck Shotton

Thursday, 18 May 1995

• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal John A. Kunze

Wednesday, 17 May 1995

• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal James Gosling

Thursday, 18 May 1995

• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal John Franks

Wednesday, 17 May 1995

• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Chuck Shotton
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Daniel W. Connolly
• Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Ronald E. Daniel
• Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Ari Luotonen

Friday, 12 May 1995

• Re: HTTP status code for "Password Expired"? David - Morris

Thursday, 11 May 1995

• Re: HTTP status code for "Password Expired"? Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
• Re: Where to estimate "link speed", and why not Jeffrey C. Sedayao
• Re: HTTP status code for "Password Expired"? Rick Troth
• Re: HTTP status code for "Password Expired"? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: HTTP 1.1 wish list page? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Whither mxs? [was: Possible New Optional Field in Header?] Roy T. Fielding

Wednesday, 10 May 1995

• Re: Where to estimate "link speed", and Levine, David M.
• Re: Possible New Optional Field in Heade Brian Behlendorf
• Where to estimate "link speed", and why not Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Possible New Optional Field in Heade Larry Masinter
• Re: Possible New Optional Field in Heade Levine, David M.
• Re: Worries about content-length Arthur Gleckler
• Re: Worries about content-length Larry Masinter
• Re: Worries about content-length Arthur Gleckler
• Re: Worries about content-length Alex Hopmann
• Re: Worries about content-length David - Morris
• Re: Worries about content-length David - Morris

Tuesday, 9 May 1995

• Re: Worries about content-length Alex Hopmann
• Re: Possible New Optional Field in Header? Barry Johnson
• Re: Possible New Optional Field in Header? Brian Behlendorf
• Re: Worries about content-length Paul Hoffman
• Re: Worries about content-length Paul Hoffman
• Whither mxs? [was: Possible New Optional Field in Header?] Dan Connolly
• Possible New Optional Field in Header? Levine, David M.
• Re: Worries about content-length David - Morris
• Re: Worries about content-length Rich Salz
• Re: Worries about content-length Larry Masinter
• Re: Worries about content-length David - Morris
• Re: Worries about content-length Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Worries about content-length Patrick R. Michaud

Monday, 8 May 1995

• Re: Worries about content-length Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Worries about content-length James Gosling
• Re: Worries about content-length James Gosling
• Re: Worries about content-length Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Worries about content-length James Gosling
• Re: Worries about content-length Alex Hopmann
• Re: Worries about content-length Ned Freed
• Re: Worries about content-length Larry Masinter
• Re: Worries about content-length Ned Freed
• Re: Worries about content-length Larry Masinter
• Re: Worries about content-length Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Worries about content-length Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• HTTP 1.1 wish list page? Dave Kristol
• Re: Worries about content-length Rick Troth
• Re: Worries about content-length Paul Hoffman
• Re: Worries about content-length Larry Masinter
• Worries about content-length Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no

Sunday, 7 May 1995

• Re: Minutes from Danvers? Paul Hoffman

Saturday, 6 May 1995

• HTTP status code for "Password Expired"? matthew noell

Thursday, 4 May 1995

• Re: Minutes from Danvers? Dave Raggett
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Larry Masinter
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Keld J|rn Simonsen
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol

Wednesday, 3 May 1995

• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly

Thursday, 4 May 1995

• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
• Re: Minutes from Danvers? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Larry Masinter
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
• Minutes from Danvers? Paul Hoffman
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams

Wednesday, 3 May 1995

• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly

Thursday, 4 May 1995

• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
• Re: Deployment of Format negociation (sic) John Franks
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel

Wednesday, 3 May 1995

• Deployment of Format negociation [was: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?] Dan Connolly
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
• Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel

Tuesday, 2 May 1995

• Comments on draft-ietf-http-v10-spec-00.ps David Robinson

Sunday, 30 April 1995

• WWW Servers Comparison Chart, version 2.1 WWW server FAQ

Thursday, 27 April 1995

• Opaque Mike Cowlishaw
• Opaque Mike Cowlishaw
• Re: Opaque Dave Kristol
• Opaque Mike Cowlishaw
• Re: Digest authentication Dave Kristol

Wednesday, 26 April 1995

• Re: Digest authentication wmperry@spry.com
• Digest authentication Mike Cowlishaw

Tuesday, 25 April 1995

• another Digest test Dave Kristol
• Re: Digest Auth... wmperry@spry.com

Monday, 24 April 1995

• Re: Digest Auth... Eric W. Sink
• Re: Digest Auth... wmperry@spry.com
• Re: Digest Auth... Eric W. Sink
• Re: Digest Auth... wmperry@spry.com

Sunday, 23 April 1995

• Re: Digest Auth... John Franks
• Digest Auth... wmperry@spry.com

Friday, 21 April 1995

• Subscribe Jorge Paulo Ferreira Simao

Wednesday, 19 April 1995

• (no subject) Elliot Tricoche

Tuesday, 18 April 1995

• Re: comments in HTTP headers Chuck Shotton
• Re: comments in HTTP headers Rich Salz
• Re: comments in HTTP headers Roy T. Fielding
• Re: comments in HTTP headers Albert Lunde
• Re: comments in HTTP headers Chuck Shotton
• Re: comments in HTTP headers Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 11 April 1995

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-mda-00.txt Internet-Drafts@cnri.reston.va.us
• Sign-Off Kristin C.

Monday, 10 April 1995

• comments in HTTP headers Dave Kristol
• Re: Protecting heirarchies Brian Behlendorf
• Protecting heirarchies Gavin Nicol

Friday, 7 April 1995

• Re: Multilingual WWW Daniel W. Connolly
• Re: Multilingual WWW Gavin Nicol
• List of HTTP servers WWW server FAQ
• Re: Multilingual WWW Francois Yergeau

Thursday, 6 April 1995

• Multilingual WWW Gavin Nicol

Wednesday, 5 April 1995

• Harvest cache now available as an ``httpd accelerator'' Mike Schwartz

Tuesday, 4 April 1995

• Comments on latest draft Eric W. Sink
• Re: HTTP/1.0 Issues Rick Troth

Sunday, 2 April 1995

• HTTP-NG checkpoint 2 Simon Spero

Saturday, 1 April 1995

• Re: Why is From: limited? Chuck Shotton
• Re: HTTP/1.1 issues Larry Masinter
• Re: Why is From: limited? Roman Czyborra

Last message date: Monday, 26 June 1995 11:51:44 UTC